Required Minimum Distribution Age 73 Rules: How SECURE 2.0 Reshaped Lifetime RMDs and What Retirees Must Do in 2026
When RMDs start — the SECURE 2.0 age tiers
The required minimum distribution starting age has changed three times in five years. Keeping track of which rule applies depends on birth year.
Pre-SECURE Act (deaths/birthdays before 2020). RMDs started at age 70.5. This was the rule from the 1980s through 2019.
SECURE Act (effective January 1, 2020). RMDs start at age 72 for individuals who hadn’t reached 70.5 by December 31, 2019.
SECURE 2.0 Act (effective January 1, 2023). RMDs start at:
– Age 73 for individuals born between January 1, 1951 and December 31, 1959.
– Age 75 for individuals born on or after January 1, 1960.
Quick reference chart:
– Born 1949 or earlier: applicable age 70.5, RMDs began before 2020 (or in 2020 for those who delayed)
– Born July 1, 1949 through December 31, 1950: applicable age 72, RMDs began in 2021-2022
– Born 1951-1959: applicable age 73, RMDs begin in 2024-2032
– Born 1960 and later: applicable age 75, RMDs begin in 2035 and beyond
Why the change. Congress’s stated rationale: people are living longer and working longer, so the RMD start age should reflect that. The cynic’s view: the federal budget benefits when retirement assets stay tax-deferred longer (eventually higher RMD amounts are taxed at the retiree’s older-age marginal rate, often higher than the rate during the early retirement years).
The ‘applicable age’ under IRC §401(a)(9)(C)(v). The statutory term for the RMD starting age is the ‘applicable age,’ which references the SECURE 2.0 changes.
Required Beginning Date (RBD). This is the deadline for the FIRST RMD. Under IRC §408(a)(6) and §401(a)(9)(C), the RBD is April 1 of the year following the year in which the individual reaches the applicable age.
Example. Born 1953, reaches age 73 in 2026. RBD is April 1, 2027.
Born 1955, reaches age 73 in 2028. RBD is April 1, 2029.
Born 1962, reaches age 75 in 2037. RBD is April 1, 2038.
The RBD is a deadline. The first RMD can be taken anytime in the year the retiree reaches the applicable age (between January 1 and December 31) OR delayed until April 1 of the following year (the RBD).
Subsequent RMDs (years 2 forward) must be taken by December 31 of each year. No deferral option.
The ‘two RMDs in one year’ trap. If the retiree delays the first RMD to April 1 of the year after reaching applicable age, the second RMD is still due by December 31 of that same year. So both the year 1 RMD and the year 2 RMD are taken in the same calendar year. This often pushes the retiree into a higher tax bracket than spreading would have done.
Example. Retiree born 1953, $1M IRA at end of 2026 (the year they turn 73). Year 1 RMD: $1M / 27.4 = $36,496. Delay to April 1, 2027. Year 2 RMD also due December 31, 2027: approximately $37,000 (using year 2 balance and divisor). Both taken in 2027: combined $73K of taxable income in one year vs. $36K each in 2026 and 2027 separately.
Whether to delay or not. Most retirees should NOT delay the first RMD. Take it in the year you reach the applicable age. Splits the income recognition over two years, lower brackets in each year. Only delay if year 1 income is unusually high (large capital gain, large bonus, etc.) and year 2 will be lower.
How to calculate the RMD — Uniform Lifetime Table mechanics
The required minimum distribution age 73 rules require a specific calculation each year. The math is straightforward but the inputs matter.
RMD = December 31 prior-year balance / Life expectancy factor
The life expectancy factor comes from one of two IRS tables published in Treas. Reg. §1.401(a)(9)-9.
Table 1: Uniform Lifetime Table. Used by most retirees. Assumes the spouse is exactly 10 years younger (a built-in ‘safe harbor’ assumption that produces favorable life expectancy factors).
Table 2: Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table. Used by retirees whose sole spouse beneficiary is MORE than 10 years younger. Produces longer life expectancy (smaller RMD) than the Uniform Lifetime Table.
Uniform Lifetime Table factors (from the 2022 updated tables):
– Age 73: divisor 27.4 → 3.65% of balance
– Age 74: 26.5 → 3.77%
– Age 75: 25.6 → 3.91%
– Age 80: 21.1 → 4.74%
– Age 85: 17.0 → 5.88%
– Age 90: 13.1 → 7.63%
– Age 95: 9.5 → 10.53%
– Age 100: 6.4 → 15.63%
Each year, the divisor decreases (i.e., the RMD percentage of balance grows). By the time the retiree is in their 90s, the RMD might be 8-15% of the balance annually.
Calculation example. 75-year-old in 2026 with $500,000 IRA balance on December 31, 2025.
RMD = $500,000 / 25.6 (Uniform Lifetime Table at age 75) = $19,531
Must be taken by December 31, 2026.
The 12/31 balance rule. The RMD calculation uses the IRA balance as of December 31 of the prior year. Not the current year. Not when you remember. Always the December 31 prior-year balance. The custodian’s year-end statement is the source.
For multiple IRAs aggregated. Add the December 31 balances of all the retiree’s traditional IRAs, then compute one RMD using the Uniform Lifetime Table (or Joint Life if applicable). Withdraw the RMD from any one (or multiple) of the IRAs to satisfy the requirement.
Joint Life and Last Survivor Table — when it applies.
Only used when the SOLE beneficiary of the IRA is the retiree’s spouse who is MORE than 10 years younger. Both conditions must be met:
– Spouse is sole beneficiary (not partial; if the spouse is one of several beneficiaries, the Joint Life Table doesn’t apply)
– Age gap is more than 10 years (the retiree is 12+ years older than the spouse)
Example. 73-year-old retiree married to a 60-year-old spouse who is the sole beneficiary. Age gap: 13 years. Joint Life Table applies. Factor at ages 73 and 60: approximately 28.2 (vs. 27.4 under Uniform Lifetime Table).
RMD on $1M = $1,000,000 / 28.2 = $35,461 (vs. $36,496 under Uniform Lifetime Table).
Modest difference at age 73. The Joint Life Table provides bigger savings at older ages.
If the spouse beneficiary dies or is changed, the Uniform Lifetime Table applies from that point forward. If the retiree gets divorced, the Uniform Lifetime Table applies (no spouse beneficiary).
Special accounts.
Roth IRAs. NO RMDs during the lifetime of the original owner. Roth IRAs were exempted from RMDs by Congress to encourage saving. Roth 401(k)s WERE subject to RMDs before SECURE 2.0 §325 (effective 2024) removed the lifetime RMD requirement. Now Roth 401(k)s also have no lifetime RMDs.
Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s have RMDs AFTER death for beneficiaries under the 10-year rule (for non-EDB beneficiaries) under SECURE Act, but no lifetime RMDs.
Inherited IRAs. Non-spouse beneficiaries subject to the 10-year rule (or annual RMDs if EDB) — see the inherited IRA guide for details. Different rules than lifetime RMDs.
Annuities. Variable annuities and other annuitized retirement accounts may have separate RMD rules. The actual annuity payments often satisfy the RMD. Consult the annuity contract and the custodian.
QLAC (Qualified Longevity Annuity Contract). Up to $200,000 (2024 limit, indexed) of IRA balance can be invested in a QLAC that defers payments until age 85. The QLAC balance is excluded from the RMD calculation. Reduces the annual RMD. SECURE 2.0 raised the QLAC limit from prior $145,000 and removed the 25% restriction.
Defined benefit pensions. The pension payments are generally treated as satisfying any RMD requirement on the pension itself. The pension is separate from IRA and 401(k) RMDs.
Section 403(b) plans (university and nonprofit retirement plans). Generally treated similarly to 401(k)s. RMDs required at the applicable age. Aggregation rules differ from IRAs.
Aggregation rules — IRAs yes, 401(k)s no
When a retiree has multiple retirement accounts, the aggregation rules determine which RMDs must be taken from which accounts.
Rule for IRAs (including SEP-IRAs and SIMPLE-IRAs). All of the retiree’s IRA balances aggregate for RMD calculation purposes. Compute the total RMD across all IRAs, then withdraw from any one (or multiple) IRAs to satisfy.
Example. Retiree has three IRAs: $300K, $500K, and $200K (total $1M). RMD at age 73 = $1M / 27.4 = $36,496. Can withdraw $36,496 from the $500K IRA, leaving the others untouched. Or split: $12K from each. Or any allocation. The aggregate satisfies.
Rule for 401(k)s and 403(b)s. Each plan computes its own RMD, and the RMD must be taken from that specific plan. NO aggregation across plans.
Example. Retiree has a $200K balance in former employer A’s 401(k) and $300K balance in former employer B’s 401(k). RMDs: $200K / 27.4 = $7,299 from A’s plan. $300K / 27.4 = $10,949 from B’s plan. Total $18,248. Each plan must distribute its own portion. Can’t satisfy B’s RMD by taking more from A.
Rule for IRAs vs. 401(k)s. IRAs and 401(k)s are separate categories. You can’t aggregate an IRA RMD with a 401(k) RMD. Each is computed separately.
Practical implication. Consolidating multiple 401(k)s into a single rollover IRA simplifies RMD compliance dramatically. Rather than tracking multiple plan administrators each requiring separate RMD distributions, one IRA produces one RMD that can be distributed from anywhere.
When NOT to roll 401(k) to IRA. If the 401(k) plan has unique features worth keeping (employer stock with net unrealized appreciation treatment, after-tax contributions for mega backdoor Roth, lower-cost institutional funds, creditor protection in some states better than IRA), keep the 401(k). For RMD simplicity, however, IRA consolidation usually wins.
Still-working exception (401(k) only). If a retiree is still working for the employer sponsoring a 401(k) and is not a 5%+ owner, RMDs from THAT specific 401(k) can be delayed until April 1 of the year after the retiree separates from service. Doesn’t apply to IRAs (no still-working exception for IRAs). Doesn’t apply to 401(k)s from former employers.
Example. 75-year-old still working part-time for the employer sponsoring a 401(k) with $400K balance. Not a 5% owner. RMD from this 401(k) is delayed until retirement. But the retiree’s own IRAs and former-employer 401(k)s still require RMDs at the regular age. Mixed-status retirees should map out which accounts are subject to RMDs and which are deferred.
Inherited account aggregation. Inherited IRAs and inherited 401(k)s have their own RMD rules and don’t aggregate with the retiree’s own accounts. An inherited IRA from a deceased spouse, if elected as a spousal inherited IRA (not a spousal rollover), keeps its own RMD schedule based on the surviving spouse’s life expectancy under the EDB rules.
Multiple inherited IRAs from the same decedent aggregate with each other (since they’re from the same decedent). Multiple inherited IRAs from different decedents don’t aggregate.
Reporting on Form 1099-R. Each custodian reports the actual distributions on Form 1099-R. The retiree’s tax return reconciles the distributions against the required RMD. If the total distributions from all accounts equal or exceed the total RMD, no penalty applies.
If a retiree has 5+ retirement accounts (common for HNW retirees who’ve changed jobs multiple times and inherited some accounts), the RMD compliance becomes complex. A tax professional or a comprehensive financial advisor can map the accounts and the required distributions each year.
Qualified Charitable Distributions — the QCD strategy
The Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) is one of the more powerful tax planning tools available to retirees subject to the required minimum distribution age 73 rules.
What it is. A QCD is a distribution from a traditional IRA directly to a qualified 501(c)(3) charity. The distribution is excluded from the retiree’s taxable income AND satisfies the RMD obligation (up to the QCD limit).
Who qualifies. Retirees age 70.5 or older. Note: this age is 70.5, NOT 73. The QCD age has not been changed by SECURE Act or SECURE 2.0. Retirees can do QCDs starting at age 70.5, but RMDs only begin at age 73 (for births 1951-1959). So there’s a 2.5-year window where the retiree can do QCDs but isn’t yet subject to RMDs.
Amount limit. IRC §408(d)(8) sets the QCD limit. For 2024, the limit was $105,000 per individual. The limit is indexed for inflation; for 2026, the limit is approximately $108,000 (subject to IRS confirmation of the indexing).
Process. The retiree directs the IRA custodian to make a check payable to the qualified charity from the IRA. The check is sent to the charity. The distribution doesn’t pass through the retiree’s hands.
Tax treatment. The QCD is excluded from gross income. Doesn’t appear on the retiree’s Form 1040 as a taxable IRA distribution. The Form 1099-R from the custodian will show a distribution but the retiree’s return shows the QCD portion as non-taxable (via Form 1040 instructions and software handling).
RMD satisfaction. The QCD counts toward the retiree’s RMD obligation up to the QCD limit. So a retiree with a $50K RMD obligation who does a $50K QCD has satisfied the entire RMD with no taxable income recognition.
Limit comparison. RMD might be $36K. QCD limit is $108K. The QCD can exceed the RMD — the excess just doesn’t have RMD implications (no double benefit) but does provide the charitable contribution exclusion.
Tax efficiency. QCD is dramatically more tax-efficient than the alternative of (a) taking the RMD as taxable income, then (b) donating to charity and itemizing the deduction.
Alternative (taxable distribution + itemized deduction):
– RMD: $36K taxable income at 24% = $8,640 federal tax – Charitable deduction: $36K itemized at 24% = $8,640 federal tax savings – Net: $0 federal income tax (assuming itemization without limits)
QCD:
– RMD satisfied via QCD: $0 taxable income – No charitable deduction (already excluded) – Net: $0 federal income tax
Why QCD wins in practice. The taxable distribution + itemized deduction approach has hidden costs: – AGI is higher with the distribution → triggers AGI-based phase-outs (medical deduction floor, IRMAA for Medicare premiums, NIIT, etc.) – State tax: many states don’t allow the charitable deduction or have lower limits, so state tax IS owed on the distribution – Itemization may not be feasible (standard deduction is $30K+ for MFJ — charity has to exceed the threshold for itemization to matter)
QCD avoids all these issues. Lower AGI = lower IRMAA, lower NIIT exposure, lower state tax, no need to itemize.
QCD trustee-to-trustee rule. The check must go directly from the IRA custodian to the charity. If the retiree receives the check (made out to retiree) and then writes a personal check to the charity, the QCD treatment is lost — it’s a taxable distribution plus a separate charitable contribution.
Qualified charities. The recipient must be a 501(c)(3) public charity. NOT: – Donor-advised funds (DAFs) – Private foundations – Supporting organizations – Charitable remainder trusts – Charitable gift annuities (with one exception below)
SECURE 2.0 one-time QCD exception. The Act §307 added a one-time exception allowing $50K (indexed; approximately $54K in 2026) of QCD to be made to a Charitable Gift Annuity, Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust, or Charitable Remainder Unitrust. This is a one-time election and counts against the annual QCD limit.
QCD strategy across the lifecycle: – Ages 70.5-72: QCDs reduce IRA balance (and future RMDs) before RMDs kick in. Pre-RMD QCD years. – Ages 73+: QCDs satisfy RMDs without taxable income. – Throughout: tax-efficient charitable giving for retirees with substantial IRAs and charitable intent.
QCDs replace the need to itemize for charitable donations. Many retirees take the standard deduction now (because charitable giving alone isn’t enough to exceed standard deduction). QCD provides the tax benefit of the charitable contribution without requiring itemization.
For a charitably-inclined retiree with $1M+ in IRAs, QCD is the default strategy. Direct large portions of RMDs (and beyond) to charity through QCD. Skip the income recognition entirely.
The 25% missed-RMD penalty — and the 10% correction window
Before SECURE 2.0, the penalty for failing to take an RMD was 50% of the missed amount. Brutal. SECURE 2.0 §107 reduced it to 25% — still significant but more manageable.
IRC §4974 imposes the excise tax. The tax applies when an RMD is not taken by the December 31 deadline (or April 1 for the first-year RMD if the deferral was elected).
Current penalty structure (post-SECURE 2.0):
– 25% of the missed RMD amount (general rule)
– 10% if the missed RMD is corrected within the ‘correction window’ — typically 2 years from the end of the year in which the RMD was missed
Example. RMD of $36,000 missed in 2025. Corrected in 2027 (within 2 years). Penalty: $36,000 × 10% = $3,600. Corrected in 2028 or later (outside 2 years). Penalty: $36,000 × 25% = $9,000.
The IRS will often waive the penalty entirely on reasonable cause request. So a properly documented waiver request can drop the penalty to $0.
Reporting on Form 5329 Part IX (Additional Tax on Excess Accumulation in Qualified Retirement Plans).
Line 52: Minimum required distribution
Line 53: Amount actually distributed
Line 54: Subtract line 53 from line 52 (the missed amount)
Line 55: Additional tax = 25% or 10% of line 54 (or enter $0 if requesting waiver)
Reasonable cause waiver process.
If the missed RMD was due to reasonable cause (illness, custodian error, recent inheritance, advisor confusion, etc.), the IRS will often waive the penalty. The waiver request requires:
1. File Form 5329 for the year in question. Enter the missed amount on Line 54. Enter $0 on Line 55 (the penalty calculation, but you’re requesting waiver).
2. Attach a written statement explaining: – The facts of why the RMD was missed – The reasonable cause for the missed RMD – The remediation — when you took the corrective distribution and how much – An explicit request that the penalty be waived under IRC §4974(d)
3. Take the corrective distribution. Withdraw the missed amount immediately. This is taxable income in the year you actually take it (not the year you missed).
4. File Form 1040-X if needed. If the year of the missed RMD is already past, file an amended return for that year with Form 5329 attached.
5. Mail to the IRS. Processing time: 4-6 months. Most reasonable cause waivers are granted.
Reasonable cause examples that typically get waivers:
– ‘I recently inherited the IRA and was not aware of the annual RMD requirement.’
– ‘My financial advisor failed to notify me of the upcoming RMD obligation.’
– ‘I experienced a serious illness during [period] that prevented me from handling tax matters.’
– ‘The custodian’s automatic RMD calculation was incorrect, and I relied on it in good faith.’
– ‘I separated from my spouse during the relevant period and was distracted by personal circumstances.’
Reasonable cause examples that typically don’t get waivers:
– ‘I forgot.’
– ‘I didn’t want to pay the tax on the distribution.’
– ‘I disagreed with the rule.’
Pattern of misses. If a retiree has missed RMDs in multiple consecutive years, the waiver becomes harder to obtain. The IRS expects retirees to learn from one missed RMD; repeated misses suggest systemic compliance problems.
Recent IRS guidance on transition issues. IRS Notice 2023-54 and subsequent notices provided automatic relief for certain missed RMDs during the SECURE Act 2.0 transition years (2020-2024). For most retirees subject to lifetime RMDs at age 73, the regular rules now apply in 2026 and forward.
Practical guidance to avoid missed RMDs:
1. Calendar reminder for each year. Set a reminder for November 1 (60 days before deadline) to verify the RMD has been taken or schedule the distribution.
2. Automate distributions with the custodian. Set up an annual or monthly automatic distribution that satisfies the RMD by year-end.
3. Use the custodian’s RMD calculation tools. Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard all provide annual RMD calculations and reminders.
4. Engage a CPA for annual tax review. RMD compliance is a standard part of annual retirement tax planning.
5. Consolidate accounts where possible. Fewer accounts = simpler RMD tracking.
Missed RMDs are common but avoidable. The penalty is manageable but unnecessary.
The 'two RMDs in one year' bracket-busting risk
The first-year RMD has a unique deferral option: take it by April 1 of the year after reaching applicable age, instead of December 31 of the year you turn that age. Most retirees should NOT use the deferral. Here’s why.
The deferral mechanism. Suppose retiree turns 73 in 2026. Two options for the first RMD:
Option A: Take by December 31, 2026.
– 2026 RMD: based on 12/31/2025 balance.
– 2027 RMD: based on 12/31/2026 balance (taken by 12/31/2027).
– Each year, one RMD.
Option B: Defer first RMD to April 1, 2027 (the RBD).
– 2026 RMD: deferred. Not taken in 2026 calendar year.
– April 1, 2027: 2026 RMD due.
– December 31, 2027: 2027 RMD due.
– Result: TWO RMDs in calendar year 2027.
Why the defer-to-April-1 path is usually bad.
Bracket impact. Two RMDs in 2027 = approximately double the income recognition in that year. For a retiree with $1M IRA, that’s $36K vs. $73K in 2027. The higher income may push the retiree into a higher federal bracket, trigger NIIT, increase IRMAA Medicare surcharges, and reduce state-level deduction phase-outs.
Example. Retiree age 73 in 2026, $1M IRA, $50K other income (pension + Social Security).
Option A (take RMD in 2026): 2026 income = $50K + $36K RMD = $86K. 2027 income = $50K + $37K RMD = $87K. Federal bracket 22% in both years. Predictable.
Option B (defer to April 2027): 2026 income = $50K. 2027 income = $50K + $73K RMDs (both 2026 and 2027) = $123K. Federal bracket 24% in 2027.
Result: Option B costs roughly $1,500-$2,000 of additional federal tax in 2027 vs. spreading.
Plus Medicare IRMAA. The 2027 income of $123K may trigger Medicare Part B and Part D surcharges (income above $103K for individual filer in 2024, indexed). The IRMAA surcharge can add $1,000-$2,000 of Medicare premium increases for one year. Cumulatively significant.
Plus NIIT. The 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax on investment income over $200K MFJ ($125K single) — the higher 2027 income may not push the retiree over the NIIT threshold, but for higher-income retirees, the cumulative effect of stacking RMDs into one year can.
When deferral makes sense.
Rare cases: – Year 1 income is unusually high (capital gain on home sale, large bonus, etc.) and year 2 will be much lower. Defer to year 2 to fill lower brackets. – Year 1 includes Roth conversion that fills the bracket; deferring RMD to year 2 spreads income. – Retiree turns 73 in December and has minimal time to coordinate the RMD before year-end.
In all other situations, take the first RMD in the year you turn 73. Smooth out the income recognition.
Practical implementation. As the retiree approaches age 73, the planning should occur in advance: – 6 months before turning 73: review the IRA balances, project the RMD amount. – At age 73: calculate the RMD from the prior December 31 balance. – During the year: take the RMD as a single distribution or as periodic distributions (monthly is common). – December: verify the RMD was satisfied.
QCD coordination. As discussed, QCDs satisfy the RMD without income recognition. For a charitably-inclined retiree, the QCD strategy entirely sidesteps the ‘two RMDs’ problem by removing income from the equation regardless of when distributions occur.
Spousal planning. If the retiree’s spouse is also approaching RMD age, plan both spouses’ RMDs in coordination. Taking both first RMDs in the same year amplifies the income recognition. Stagger first RMDs across years if possible.
Final note. The ‘two RMDs in one year’ trap is one of the most common planning mistakes for retirees turning 73. Avoidable with simple coordination. Don’t fall into it.
Roth conversion strategy before age 73
The years between retirement and the start of RMDs (typically ages 65-72 for a Boomer-era retiree, or 65-74 for those born 1960+) are the ‘sweet spot’ for Roth conversions.
The setup. Retirees in this window often have low ordinary income — pensions and Social Security may be the main income, with capital gains and dividends as supplementary. Total income might be $50K-$120K, putting the retiree in the 12-22% federal bracket. Significantly lower than the bracket they were in during peak working years.
Roth conversion taxes the converted amount at the current bracket. Converting from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA at 22% federal is dramatically cheaper than: – Future RMDs that may push the retiree into 24-32% brackets (especially when Social Security and pension are combined) – Future inherited IRA distributions for beneficiaries who may be in 32-37% brackets
The math. $100K Roth conversion at 22% federal = $22K of tax now. Without conversion, the same $100K stays in traditional IRA. If it grows to $200K by the time it’s distributed (as RMDs over the retiree’s lifetime or as inherited IRA distributions for beneficiaries), the distributions might be taxed at 32% federal + state = $64K-$80K of tax. The conversion pre-pays at the lower rate, saving $40K-$60K over the long term.
How much to convert. Generally, fill the lower brackets each year: – Convert up to the top of the 22% bracket ($94,300 single, $201,050 MFJ for 2024, slightly higher in 2026) – Or up to the top of the 24% bracket ($201,050 single, $383,900 MFJ)
Don’t fill higher brackets just to maximize conversion volume. The pre-payment makes sense only when the conversion rate is meaningfully below the projected future distribution rate.
Timing. Convert before RMDs start. After age 73, the retiree must satisfy RMDs first, THEN can convert additional amounts above the RMD. Pre-RMD years allow conversion without the RMD constraint.
Conversion process. Custodian-to-custodian transfer from traditional IRA to Roth IRA. The converted amount is income in the year of conversion. Pay the tax with non-IRA funds (taxable account, cash, etc.) — don’t use the converted amount to pay the tax. The full converted balance should land in the Roth.
Five-year rule on conversions. Each conversion has a 5-year holding period for tax-free withdrawal of EARNINGS on the converted amount (the principal can be withdrawn immediately tax-free, but earnings face the 5-year rule). For retirees who’ll hold the Roth for life, the 5-year rule is mostly academic. For retirees who might need the funds within 5 years of conversion, account for the rule.
Conversion + QCD combination. Some retirees do annual conversions AND annual QCDs in the same year. Convert $80K from traditional to Roth (creates $80K of taxable income). QCD $30K from traditional IRA directly to charity (no taxable income recognition). The combined effect: $80K of additional taxable income, $30K of RMD satisfied, $80K added to Roth balance.
Long-term wealth comparison. Scenario A: No conversions. Retiree leaves $1M in traditional IRA. RMDs over 25 years (ages 73-98) cumulative ~$1.5M (RMDs grow with age). Tax at 24% effective = $360K. Remaining balance (depleted): $0. Beneficiaries inherit $0 from this IRA (other assets continue). Scenario B: Aggressive conversions. Convert $100K/year for 5 years pre-RMD (ages 68-72). Pay $115K of tax during the conversion years (at 22% federal + state). Remaining traditional IRA balance: $500K. Roth balance: $500K (plus 5 years of tax-free growth). After age 73, RMDs on $500K traditional, balance depletes over time. Roth grows tax-free for life. At death (age 90, hypothetically), traditional balance $0, Roth balance $1.5M (growth of $500K original at 7% for 22 years). Difference. Scenario B’s beneficiaries inherit a $1.5M Roth (tax-free under SECURE Act 10-year rule). Scenario A leaves nothing in the IRA. The conversion strategy saves the family $300K-$500K of inherited income tax compared to passing a fully-depleted traditional IRA balance.
Conversion limits and gotchas. Watch for: – IRMAA Medicare surcharges (income-related Medicare premium increases) — conversions can push the retiree into higher IRMAA tiers. – ACA subsidy phase-out (if the retiree is under 65 and getting marketplace coverage) — conversions can disqualify subsidies. – State tax — some states tax IRA conversions at full state rate (NY, CA, MA, etc.). – Pro-rata rule — if the retiree has nondeductible contributions in any traditional IRA, the conversion is partially nontaxable (return of basis). Track basis via Form 8606.
Roth conversion strategy is the standard play for HNW retirees pre-RMD. Coordinate with a CPA to model the multi-year tax projection.
Form 5329 Part IX — reporting and remediation
Form 5329 ‘Additional Taxes on Qualified Plans (Including IRAs) and Other Tax-Favored Accounts’ is the form used to report the 25% excise tax on missed RMDs. Most retirees will never file Form 5329 Part IX (because RMDs are taken on time). But for the unfortunate cases, here’s the process.
When to file Form 5329 Part IX. When an RMD is missed — full amount or partial. If the retiree took less than the required minimum, the shortfall is the missed amount.
Filling out Part IX:
Line 52: Minimum required distribution for the year. Enter the calculated RMD amount.
Line 53: Amount actually distributed during the year. Enter the total distributions taken (not including QCDs that don’t count toward RMD if applicable, but generally QCDs count up to the QCD limit).
Line 54: Line 52 minus Line 53. Enter the missed amount. This is the amount subject to the 25% (or 10% with correction) excise tax.
Line 55: Additional tax. Enter the penalty calculation (25% × Line 54 or 10% × Line 54). If requesting waiver, enter $0.
Attach a waiver request letter if applicable.
Filing year. File Form 5329 for the year in which the RMD was missed. If the retiree’s regular 1040 has already been filed, attach Form 5329 to a Form 1040-X amended return.
If the retiree is filing late and amending. Form 1040-X has its own deadline — generally 3 years from the original return filing date. After that, the assessment may be foreclosed by statute. But the IRS can still pursue penalties separately.
Multi-year missed RMD scenario. Suppose the retiree missed RMDs in 2022, 2023, AND 2024. Three separate years of compliance failures.
Process:
1. File Form 5329 for 2022. Enter the 2022 missed amount on Line 54. Penalty calculation. Waiver request.
2. File Form 5329 for 2023. Same process.
3. File Form 5329 for 2024. Same process.
Each year is a separate filing. Each gets its own waiver consideration.
Take the cumulative corrective distribution. The retiree withdraws the total of all missed amounts. The corrective distribution is taxable income in the year actually withdrawn (typically the current year).
Penalty stacking. If the IRS denies waiver, the penalty applies to each year separately. 25% × 3 years’ worth of RMDs is a substantial cost. Aggressive waiver pursuit is justified.
IRS audit risk. Missed RMD penalties are detected through automatic matching of Form 1099-R against the projected RMD calculation. For IRAs, the custodian reports to the IRS, and the IRS calculates an expected RMD. If actual distributions are below expected, the IRS issues a notice. The notice gives the retiree an opportunity to explain.
Responding to IRS RMD notice. The notice typically states the missed RMD amount and the calculated penalty. The retiree responds with:
1. Confirmation of the missed amount (or correction of the IRS calculation if wrong)
2. Evidence of corrective distribution (1099-R from the corrective year)
3. Waiver request with reasonable cause letter
4. Form 5329 for the missed year
Many initial IRS notices are resolved favorably with proper response.
Custodian responsibilities. Custodians have an obligation under SECURE 2.0 to send RMD notifications to retirees each year. The notification should include the calculated RMD amount and the December 31 deadline. Retirees should check that they receive this notice annually.
Custodian errors. If the custodian’s calculation is wrong (e.g., uses the wrong table, applies the wrong divisor, or fails to send a notice), the retiree may have a stronger waiver case. Document the custodian error. Some retirees pursue the custodian for the penalty amount as well — this is a separate matter from the IRS proceeding.
Final note. Form 5329 Part IX is a ‘sorry, won’t happen again’ form. It’s filed in response to a problem. The much better path is to never need it — take RMDs on time, every time. Set systems and processes in place to make compliance routine.
State tax treatment of RMDs
RMDs are taxable as ordinary income for federal purposes. State treatment varies significantly across the country.
States that tax RMDs fully (mirror federal treatment):
– New York: full RMD taxable as ordinary income. Modest exemption for retirees 59.5+ ($20,000 of retirement income).
– New Jersey: full RMD taxable. Retiree exemption available up to certain income limits ($100K combined retirement income for joint filers).
– California: full RMD taxable as ordinary income. No retiree-specific exemption (except for railroad retirement and military retirement).
– Massachusetts: full RMD taxable.
– Illinois: federally taxable retirement income (including RMDs) is EXEMPT from Illinois state tax. Unique among the high-tax states.
– Pennsylvania: federally taxable retirement income is generally exempt from PA state tax. Similar to Illinois.
States with no income tax (RMDs not taxed at state level):
– Florida, Texas, Nevada, Washington, Wyoming, South Dakota, Alaska, Tennessee.
– New Hampshire: only taxes interest and dividend income; not RMD distributions.
States with retirement income exemptions:
– Illinois: full exemption for federally taxed retirement income.
– Pennsylvania: generally exempt.
– Alabama, Hawaii, Mississippi: pension income generally exempt; IRA distributions may have partial exemption.
– Michigan, Ohio, others: various age-based and income-based exemptions.
Why state tax matters. For a retiree with a $500K IRA, lifetime RMDs might total $750K-$1M. At California’s 9.3% top marginal state rate, that’s $70K-$90K of state tax over the retirement. At Florida’s 0% rate, $0.
State of residency planning. Some retirees relocate from high-tax states to no-tax states specifically for retirement. The state tax savings on RMDs and other retirement income can be $100K-$300K+ over the retirement.
Mechanics of moving. Must establish actual residency in the new state. Sell or rent out the prior state’s home. Change driver’s license. Change voter registration. Spend more than 183 days in the new state (some states use day-counting tests). Change physician, dentist, attorney, CPA. Update beneficiary designations to reflect new state residency.
California aggressiveness. California is particularly aggressive about claiming continuing residency for taxpayers who claim to have moved. The Franchise Tax Board uses extensive ‘closer connection’ tests. Maintaining a California home, family ties, business presence, or even safe deposit boxes can sustain a California residency claim. Properly cutting ties takes deliberate effort.
Multistate RMDs. If a retiree is taxed in multiple states (e.g., split residency, vacation home rental income in one state, etc.), the RMD is generally taxed in the state of legal residency. Some states have specific sourcing rules for retirement income.
Tax treaty considerations for international retirees. US citizens living abroad still pay federal income tax on RMDs. State tax depends on whether the retiree maintains a state residency (typically not, after several years abroad). US tax treaties with foreign countries may provide relief or coordinated treatment for retirement income.
Practical advice. State tax is the second-largest variable in retirement tax planning (after federal bracket management). Coordinate state residency with overall retirement strategy. Move before retirement starts for the cleanest residency change.
What happens after RMDs — distributions, conversions, and estate planning
Once RMDs begin at age 73 (or 75 for 1960+ births), the retiree’s IRA enters the mandatory distribution phase. The strategy doesn’t end with the RMD calculation each year — there’s ongoing planning that interacts with broader retirement and estate goals.
Distribution choices. The retiree can: – Take only the minimum required (RMD-only strategy). Preserves the most balance for continued tax-deferred growth. – Take more than the minimum to fill lower tax brackets. Often optimal when the retiree has room in the 22-24% bracket. – Convert excess distributions to Roth. Pre-pays tax at current rate; allows tax-free growth in Roth for life. – Distribute to charity via QCD. Up to $108K (2026) excluded from income while satisfying RMD.
Annual review process. Each year around October or November, retirees should review: – Current year RMD amount (already calculated based on prior December 31 balance) – Whether RMD has been satisfied by current distributions – Year-end tax position — room in lower brackets, marginal rate projection – Roth conversion decision for current year (if filling brackets) – QCD decision for current year (if charitable inclination) – Beneficiary designation review
Beneficiary designations.
Primary and contingent beneficiaries on each IRA. Update after life changes (death of prior beneficiary, divorce, remarriage, birth of grandchildren, etc.). Designations override the will.
Spousal beneficiary. The spouse can roll over the IRA to their own IRA after death — most flexible option. Or treat as inherited IRA under EDB rules.
Non-spousal beneficiary. Subject to SECURE Act 10-year rule (or EDB rules if applicable). The 10-year rule forces the inherited IRA to be emptied within 10 years.
Trust beneficiary. Use carefully. The look-through trust rules (conduit vs. accumulation trust) determine RMD treatment for the beneficiaries. Coordinate with estate planning attorney.
Estate tax considerations. Federal estate tax exemption is $13.99M per individual in 2024 (indexed). Scheduled to drop to approximately $7M per individual in 2026 unless Congress acts. State estate tax exemptions are typically much lower (NY $6.94M, MA $2M, etc.).
For retirees with substantial IRAs, the IRA is included in the gross estate at full value. Pre-death distributions and conversions can reduce the IRA balance subject to estate tax. Roth conversions are particularly valuable here — the converted balance is no longer in the IRA but in a Roth (still subject to estate tax, but the income tax has been pre-paid, increasing the after-tax value).
Income in respect of a decedent (IRD). Traditional IRA balances at death are ‘IRD’ — income that the decedent would have recognized if still living. Beneficiaries pay income tax on IRD distributions. If the estate also pays estate tax on the IRD, beneficiaries get an itemized deduction (IRC §691(c)) to mitigate the double tax. Complex; coordinate with the estate’s tax preparer.
QCD and large IRA planning. For a retiree with $5M in IRAs and charitable intent, QCDs of $108K/year over 15-20 years can transfer $1.6M-$2.2M to charity tax-free. Reduces the IRA balance subject to estate tax AND eliminates income tax that would otherwise apply.
Final note. The post-RMD years (ages 73+ for the typical retiree) require ongoing tax planning, not just compliance. RMD-only strategy is often suboptimal. Roth conversions and QCDs reshape the long-term tax picture. Engage a CPA or fee-only financial advisor for annual review and multi-year strategy.
RMDs from 401(k) plans and 403(b) plans
RMDs from employer-sponsored retirement plans (401(k), 403(b), 457(b), TSP) follow similar but distinct rules from IRA RMDs.
Applicable age. Same as for IRAs — 73 for births 1951-1959, 75 for births 1960+.
Required Beginning Date. Generally April 1 of the year after reaching applicable age, with one important exception (the still-working exception below).
Calculation. Same Uniform Lifetime Table. Same Joint Life Table when the sole spouse beneficiary is 10+ years younger.
Aggregation. NO aggregation across plans. Each 401(k), 403(b), etc. has its own RMD that must be taken from that specific plan.
Roth 401(k) RMDs. Before SECURE 2.0 §325 (effective 2024), Roth 401(k) accounts had lifetime RMDs. SECURE 2.0 removed the lifetime RMD requirement for Roth 401(k)s. Now Roth 401(k)s behave like Roth IRAs — no lifetime RMDs. RMDs only apply to inherited Roth 401(k)s for non-EDB beneficiaries under the 10-year rule.
Roth-eligible 401(k) employees should consider switching contributions to Roth designations where the plan allows — avoids future RMD requirements.
Still-working exception. If a retiree is still working for the employer sponsoring a 401(k) plan AND is not a 5%+ owner of the employer, RMDs from THAT specific 401(k) can be deferred until April 1 of the year after the retiree separates from service.
Doesn’t apply to: – IRA RMDs (no still-working exception for IRAs) – Former employer 401(k) RMDs (the still-working exception applies only to the current employer) – 5%+ owners (must take RMDs regardless of work status)
Practical use. A 75-year-old still working part-time for the employer where they have a 401(k) can leave that 401(k) untouched and not take RMDs from it until they actually retire. The other 401(k)s from former employers still require RMDs. The retiree’s IRAs still require RMDs.
This exception is valuable for retirees who want to keep working into their 70s or 80s without forcing distributions from current 401(k).
After retirement, the deferred RMDs all kick in. The retiree takes the prior years’ RMDs (typically just one — the year of separation) plus the current year RMD.
Lump-sum distributions from 401(k). Some retirees take lump-sum distributions from 401(k)s instead of RMDs. The full balance becomes taxable income in the year of distribution. Generally bad tax strategy unless there’s a specific reason (NUA on employer stock, early retirement need for cash, etc.).
Rollover to IRA. A 401(k) can be rolled over to an IRA at retirement (or earlier with a direct rollover). The IRA then follows the IRA RMD rules (aggregation, etc.). Often simpler than maintaining multiple 401(k) plan RMDs.
Pre-tax vs. Roth 401(k) RMDs. Pre-tax 401(k) RMDs are taxable as ordinary income. Roth 401(k) RMDs were taxable (pre-SECURE 2.0) but are no longer required as RMDs from age 73 forward. Distributions can be tax-free if the 5-year holding rule is satisfied.
Coordination with annual planning. 401(k) RMDs add to the total RMD picture. A retiree with both IRAs and 401(k)s must satisfy each RMD separately. The annual planning process should map all retirement accounts and their respective RMD requirements.
Section 457(b) plans (government and nonprofit deferred compensation). Generally follow 401(k) rules for RMDs. Roth 457(b) plans similarly removed lifetime RMDs under SECURE 2.0.
TSP (Thrift Savings Plan for federal employees). Follows 401(k) rules. Pre-tax TSP balances subject to lifetime RMDs at applicable age. Roth TSP balances (designated Roth contributions) no longer subject to lifetime RMDs after SECURE 2.0.
Frequently Asked Questions
I was born in 1953 and just turned 73 in 2026. My CPA says my first RMD is due. What do I need to do this year and what's the actual amount, and walk me through the timing under required minimum distribution age 73 rules?
Let me walk you through your specific situation step by step. The required minimum distribution age 73 rules apply directly to you because you were born in 1953 (within the SECURE 2.0 cohort of 1951-1959 births). Your applicable age is 73, and you reached it in 2026.
Step 1: Confirm the applicable age and RBD.
Applicable age: 73 (for births 1951-1959 under SECURE 2.0).
You turn 73 in 2026.
Required Beginning Date (RBD): April 1, 2027 (the April 1 following the year you turn 73).
This means your FIRST RMD must be taken by EITHER: – December 31, 2026 (the year you turn 73), or – April 1, 2027 (the deferred deadline)
You have a choice. Most retirees should take it in 2026 — see Step 5 below.
Step 2: Calculate the 2026 RMD.
The 2026 RMD uses the December 31, 2025 IRA balance and the Uniform Lifetime Table factor at age 73.
For each of your traditional IRAs: – Get the December 31, 2025 balance from the custodian’s year-end statement. – Sum the balances across all your traditional IRAs (they aggregate for RMD purposes). – Apply the Uniform Lifetime Table factor at age 73: divisor 27.4.
Formula: RMD = Sum of all IRA balances on 12/31/2025 / 27.4
Let me assume your IRA balances on December 31, 2025 totaled $600,000.
2026 RMD = $600,000 / 27.4 = $21,898
If you have multiple IRAs, you can withdraw the $21,898 from any one (or combination). The aggregation rule means you don’t have to take a proportional amount from each.
Step 3: Confirm 401(k) and other plan RMDs separately.
The aggregation rule applies only to IRAs. If you also have a 401(k) from a former employer, that plan’s RMD is separate.
Let’s say you have a $300,000 balance in a former employer 401(k). The 401(k) RMD is: $300,000 / 27.4 = $10,949
This $10,949 must be taken from THAT specific 401(k). You cannot satisfy it from your IRA.
Total RMDs for 2026: – IRA RMD: $21,898 (from any IRA or combination) – 401(k) RMD: $10,949 (from the 401(k) plan) – Combined: $32,847
If you have a Roth IRA, no RMD applies. Roth IRAs are exempt from lifetime RMDs.
If you have a Roth 401(k), no RMD applies since 2024 under SECURE 2.0 §325.
Step 4: Decide when to take the 2026 RMD.
Options:
Option A: Take in 2026 (by December 31, 2026). – Single 2026 RMD: $32,847 – 2027 will have its own RMD: approximately $34K (using 12/31/2026 balance and divisor 26.5 at age 74) – Two separate years, two separate RMDs. Smooth tax recognition.
Option B: Defer the 2026 RMD to April 1, 2027. – 2026: no RMD taken. – April 1, 2027: take the 2026 RMD ($32,847). – December 31, 2027: take the 2027 RMD (~$34K). – Result: $66,847 of RMD income in 2027 vs. ~$67K split over 2026 and 2027. – One-year spike in income.
My strong recommendation: Option A.
Reason: Two years of $32K each is better than one year of $67K. The single-year spike may push you into a higher federal bracket (24% instead of 22%), increase Medicare IRMAA surcharges for 2029 (IRMAA uses 2-year-old income), and trigger state-level phase-outs.
Option B makes sense only if 2026 has unusually high income (e.g., large capital gain on home sale) and 2027 will be much lower. In your normal situation, take the RMD in 2026.
Step 5: Execute the distribution.
For your IRA RMD ($21,898): – Contact your IRA custodian. Many will set up an automatic distribution. – Or take a one-time distribution before December 31, 2026. – The custodian will withhold federal taxes (typically 10% by default, or you can elect a different amount up to 99%). For your situation, you might want 22% federal withholding to match your expected bracket. – The custodian will report the distribution on Form 1099-R for tax year 2026.
For your 401(k) RMD ($10,949): – Contact the 401(k) plan administrator. Some plans automatically distribute RMDs; others require a participant request. – Take the distribution by December 31, 2026. – The plan will report on Form 1099-R.
State withholding. Many states require state withholding on retirement distributions. The custodian will withhold based on your state. Add it to your tax planning.
Step 6: Reporting on the 2026 tax return.
Form 1040: – Line 4a (IRA distributions): $21,898 gross – Line 4b (IRA distributions, taxable): $21,898 – Line 5a (Pensions and annuities): $10,949 gross from 401(k) – Line 5b (Pensions and annuities, taxable): $10,949
Total taxable retirement distributions: $32,847.
No Form 5329 needed — RMDs were satisfied, no penalty.
Step 7: Plan 2027 and beyond.
2027 RMD: – Uniform Lifetime Table at age 74: divisor 26.5 – Use December 31, 2026 IRA balance (after 2026 RMD and growth) – 2027 RMD ≈ $600,000 × growth less distribution / 26.5 ≈ $35,000-$36,000
Each subsequent year, the divisor decreases: – Age 75: 25.6 – Age 76: 24.6 – Age 80: 21.1 – Age 85: 17.0 – Age 90: 13.1
RMDs grow as a percentage of the balance as you age.
Step 8: QCD coordination.
If you have charitable intent, consider Qualified Charitable Distributions. At age 73, you qualify. The 2026 QCD limit is approximately $108,000.
You can direct up to $108,000 of your IRA balance directly to qualified charities. The QCD: – Excluded from income (no income tax) – Counts toward RMD (up to the $108K limit) – Doesn’t require itemization
If you would otherwise donate $20,000/year to charities, doing those donations via QCD saves $4,400 of federal tax (24% on $20K) plus potentially state tax.
If your $21,898 IRA RMD is entirely satisfied by QCDs, you have $0 taxable IRA income for 2026. Your federal tax is reduced so.
Step 9: Beneficiary designation review.
Now that you’re starting RMDs, review your IRA beneficiary designations. The SECURE Act 10-year rule applies to non-spouse beneficiaries (other than EDBs). Make sure your designations reflect your current intent.
If you’ve named your spouse as primary beneficiary: most flexible option, allowing spousal rollover.
If you’ve named children as primary beneficiaries: they’ll face the 10-year rule. Consider this in your overall estate planning.
Step 10: Engage a CPA for ongoing review.
The required minimum distribution age 73 rules now apply to you for the rest of your life. Each year, the RMD calculation, the bracket planning, the QCD decision, and the conversion/distribution strategy require attention. A CPA can run annual projections and identify opportunities.
For your 2026 specific actions: – Take the $21,898 IRA RMD by December 31, 2026 – Take the $10,949 401(k) RMD by December 31, 2026 – Total $32,847 of distributions, taxable as ordinary income – File Form 1040 for 2026 reporting the distributions – Consider QCD if charitable – Plan 2027 RMD using December 31, 2026 balance
The required minimum distribution age 73 rules are now part of your annual life. Get the routine established — automatic distributions with the custodian, annual tax review, beneficiary verification — and the compliance becomes straightforward.
I missed taking my RMD last year. What's the actual penalty under required minimum distribution age 73 rules, can I get it waived, and what's the step-by-step process to fix this?
Missing an RMD is one of the most common retirement tax mistakes, and the good news is that the IRS is generally forgiving when you correct it properly. Under SECURE 2.0, the penalty has been reduced and the process is straightforward. Let me walk you through the full remediation.
Understanding the penalty.
Under SECURE 2.0 §107 (effective 2023), the missed-RMD penalty is now 25% of the missed amount, reduced from the previous 50% under pre-2023 rules.
Additional reduction: If you take the corrective distribution within the ‘correction window’ — typically 2 years from the end of the year in which the RMD was missed — the penalty drops to 10%.
Further: The IRS will often waive the penalty entirely on reasonable cause request. Most properly documented waiver requests are granted.
Let’s say your 2024 RMD was $25,000 and you didn’t take it. The maximum penalty: – 25% × $25,000 = $6,250 if outside correction window – 10% × $25,000 = $2,500 if within correction window – $0 if waiver granted
Most real-world cases result in either the 10% penalty or $0 with waiver.
Step 1: Calculate the actual missed RMD.
First, confirm the amount that was supposed to be distributed.
For the year you missed (let’s say 2024): – Use the December 31, 2023 IRA balance. – Apply the Uniform Lifetime Table factor at your age in 2024. – RMD = Balance / factor.
Example. December 31, 2023 IRA balance: $750,000. You were age 75 in 2024. Uniform Lifetime Table factor at age 75: 25.6. RMD = $750,000 / 25.6 = $29,297.
If you took some distributions in 2024 but less than the RMD, the missed amount is the difference. Example: You took $10,000 in 2024. Missed amount: $29,297 − $10,000 = $19,297.
Step 2: Take the corrective distribution immediately.
Withdraw the missed amount from your IRA now. In the current year (let’s say 2026 if you’re discovering the 2024 miss in 2026).
Note: The corrective distribution is taxable income in the year you actually take it (2026 in this example), not the year you missed (2024). This is a 1-year deferral of income recognition.
Document the withdrawal: – Date of the withdrawal – Amount of the withdrawal – The fact that this is a corrective distribution for the 2024 missed RMD
The custodian will report on Form 1099-R for 2026.
Step 3: File Form 5329 for 2024.
Form 5329 Part IX (Additional Tax on Excess Accumulation):
Line 52: $29,297 (the 2024 RMD) Line 53: $10,000 (amount you actually distributed in 2024) Line 54: $19,297 (the shortfall — Line 52 minus Line 53) Line 55: $0 (if requesting waiver), OR $1,930 (if requesting the 10% correction-window penalty), OR $4,824 (if penalty applies at 25%)
For your circumstances, request the waiver. Enter $0 on Line 55.
Step 4: Attach a reasonable cause letter.
The letter should be 1-2 pages, clear and factual. Include:
1. Your identification: name, Social Security number, address, tax year (2024).
2. The IRA account information: custodian name, account number, year-end balance.
3. The RMD requirement: state that your 2024 RMD was $29,297 based on December 31, 2023 balance of $750,000 / 25.6.
4. What you actually distributed: $10,000 in 2024.
5. The reasonable cause: explain why the RMD wasn’t satisfied.
Reasonable cause examples that typically work: – ‘I was recently diagnosed with [serious illness] in [month/year] and was undergoing treatment during the period when I would have managed my retirement distributions. This unforeseen circumstance prevented me from completing the RMD.’ – ‘My financial advisor at the time failed to notify me of the RMD obligation. I have since changed advisors and engaged a CPA to provide ongoing RMD compliance review.’ – ‘I recently inherited the IRA from my [parent/spouse] and was not yet familiar with the annual RMD requirements that apply to lifetime IRAs.’ – ‘My IRA custodian sent the RMD notification to an outdated address that I had not yet updated. I did not receive the notification.’ – ‘My CPA failed to flag the RMD obligation during my tax preparation. I have since engaged a new CPA.’
6. The remediation: state that you took a corrective distribution of $19,297 on [date in current year]. Reference the Form 1099-R that will be issued for the current year reflecting this distribution.
7. The request: explicitly request that the penalty be waived under IRC §4974(d) on reasonable cause grounds.
Reasonable cause examples that typically don’t work: – ‘I forgot.’ – ‘I didn’t think the rules applied to me.’ – ‘I disagreed with the rule.’ – ‘The tax rates are too high.’
Keep the letter factual, professional, and concise. No emotional appeals. Stick to the legal standard for reasonable cause.
Step 5: File the amended return.
Form 1040-X for 2024 (if you’ve already filed the original 2024 return). Attach Form 5329 and the reasonable cause letter.
If you haven’t yet filed the original 2024 return: just file the original 1040 for 2024 with Form 5329 attached. No need for 1040-X.
Mail to the IRS at the address for amended returns for your state.
Keep copies of everything.
Step 6: Wait for IRS response.
Processing time: 4-6 months. Sometimes longer.
Possible outcomes:
A. IRS grants the waiver. Penalty is $0. You owe only the regular income tax on the corrective distribution in the year you actually took it (2026 in our example).
B. IRS denies the waiver. You owe the penalty (25% or 10% depending on correction window). The IRS will send a notice with the calculation.
C. IRS requests additional information. Respond with the requested documentation.
Most properly documented waiver requests are granted. The reasonable cause standard is forgiving when the taxpayer takes corrective action.
Step 7: If waiver is denied — appeal options.
If the IRS denies your waiver, you can:
1. Pay the penalty.
2. Appeal to the IRS Appeals Office (within 30 days of the denial notice). Request a conference with an Appeals Officer.
3. Pay the penalty and file for refund via Form 843. If the refund is denied, file a refund suit in Tax Court (within 2 years).
4. Don’t pay and let the IRS assess. Then contest in Tax Court (90 days from the assessment notice).
The denial appeal process can succeed if the original waiver request was weak. Stronger reasonable cause arguments and additional documentation help.
Step 8: Set up systems to prevent future misses.
Most retirees who miss an RMD do so because of a process failure, not a deliberate decision. Set up:
1. Annual calendar reminder. Set for September 1 each year as a reminder to verify the year’s RMD has been taken or scheduled.
2. Automatic distributions with the custodian. Most custodians (Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc.) offer automatic RMD calculations and distributions. Enroll.
3. Annual CPA review. Discuss RMD compliance at every annual tax meeting. Make it a standard agenda item.
4. Consolidate accounts where possible. Fewer custodians = simpler tracking. Roll inactive 401(k)s into a single IRA for aggregation simplicity.
5. Beneficiary review. While reviewing RMDs annually, also review beneficiary designations and document any changes.
Step 9: For multi-year misses.
If you’ve missed RMDs in 2022, 2023, AND 2024:
Each year is a separate compliance event. File Form 5329 for each year.
Take the cumulative corrective distribution. Withdraw the total of all missed amounts in the current year. The corrective distribution is taxable in the year actually taken.
Reasonable cause request becomes harder to sustain across multiple years. Be candid about the circumstances. If the multi-year miss was due to a specific cause (extended illness, etc.), explain that.
Multi-year misses with weak documentation may result in the 10% or 25% penalty being applied to one or more years. Even so, the penalty is manageable — $5K-$15K typically.
For required minimum distribution age 73 rules compliance, a missed RMD is a stumble, not a catastrophe. Take corrective action quickly. File the waiver request properly. The IRS process is well-established. In most cases, the result is either a fully waived penalty or a manageable 10% correction-window penalty. Set systems to avoid future misses, and you’re back on track.
I'm 71 and want to start QCDs before my RMDs kick in. How does the Qualified Charitable Distribution work in the gap years between age 70.5 and 73, and how should I plan it under required minimum distribution age 73 rules?
Excellent planning — using the gap years between age 70.5 (when QCDs are first available) and age 73 (when RMDs begin) is one of the best charitable giving strategies for retirees with traditional IRAs. Let me walk through the mechanics and the multi-year plan.
The QCD age vs. the RMD age.
The QCD age is 70.5. This age has NOT been changed by SECURE Act or SECURE 2.0. Under IRC §408(d)(8), retirees age 70.5+ can do QCDs from their traditional IRA.
The RMD age, for births 1951-1959, is 73. So there’s a window of approximately 2.5 years (between age 70.5 and the year of turning 73) where QCDs are available but RMDs are not yet required.
For you at age 71, you’re already past the QCD age threshold. You can do QCDs now.
The gap year strategy.
In the gap years (your current ages 71-72, or until your RMDs start at age 73):
1. QCDs reduce your IRA balance. 2. Reducing the IRA balance reduces the size of future RMDs. 3. Future smaller RMDs mean less future taxable income. 4. The QCD itself is excluded from current income (no current tax cost beyond the loss of future tax-deferred growth).
Let me illustrate with numbers.
Your current IRA balance: assume $500,000.
Without QCDs in gap years: – Age 73: balance grows to ~$560K (3 years at 6% growth). RMD = $560K / 27.4 = $20,438. – Age 74: balance ~$575K after RMD and growth. RMD = $575K / 26.5 = $21,698. – Cumulative RMDs ages 73-90: approximately $500K-$600K of taxable distributions.
With $40K/year QCD in gap years (ages 71, 72; total $80K of QCDs): – Age 73 starting balance: ~$520K (gap years reduced by QCDs and growth) – Age 73 RMD: $520K / 27.4 = $18,978 – Age 74 RMD: lower correspondingly – Cumulative RMDs over retirement: approximately $470K-$540K of taxable distributions.
Difference: $30K-$60K less taxable RMD income over the retirement. At 22% federal + state, that’s $9K-$15K of tax savings.
Plus: The $80K of QCDs went to charity. If you would have donated $80K anyway, the QCD route was the most tax-efficient way to do it.
The charitable giving comparison.
Method 1: QCD – $40,000/year from IRA directly to charity – $0 taxable income (excluded under IRC §408(d)(8)) – $0 federal tax on the donation – No itemization required
Method 2: Take IRA distribution + cash donation – $40,000 IRA distribution: $40,000 taxable – 22% federal + 6% state = $11,200 tax on the distribution – $40,000 cash donation: itemized deduction – If itemizing (>standard deduction): deduction at 22% federal = $8,800 tax savings – Net federal tax: $11,200 − $8,800 = $2,400 owed – Plus state: $40K × 6% = $2,400 (most states don’t deduct charity) – Total tax: $4,800
If NOT itemizing (most retirees take standard deduction): – $40,000 IRA distribution: $11,200 federal tax + $2,400 state – $40,000 donation: $0 deduction (standard deduction) – Total tax: $13,600 with no offset
The QCD saves $4,800 (if itemizing) or $13,600 (if not itemizing) in tax compared to taxable distribution + cash donation.
The non-itemization benefit is the kicker. Most retirees take the standard deduction ($30K MFJ in 2024, $32K-$34K when both spouses are 65+). Charitable donations only matter for tax purposes when they push you above the standard deduction. For modest annual donations, the deduction effectively does nothing. QCD doesn’t require exceeding the standard deduction.
The QCD limit.
For 2024, the QCD limit was $105,000 per individual. Indexed for inflation. For 2026 (your year), the limit is approximately $108,000 per individual.
If you’re married and both spouses are 70.5+, EACH spouse can do up to $108K of QCDs from their respective IRAs. Combined household limit: $216K.
Your 2026 QCD strategy.
Assuming you have $40,000 of charitable giving each year:
Direct $40K from your IRA to your chosen charities via QCD.
Qualified charities. Must be 501(c)(3) public charities. NOT: – Donor-advised funds (DAFs) — you cannot QCD to your DAF. – Private foundations – Supporting organizations – Charitable remainder trusts (except the one-time SECURE 2.0 exception below)
The SECURE 2.0 one-time exception. Section 307 of SECURE 2.0 added a one-time option to QCD up to $50K (indexed; ~$54K in 2026) to a Charitable Gift Annuity (CGA), Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust (CRAT), or Charitable Remainder Unitrust (CRUT). This is a one-time election and counts against the annual QCD limit.
The gift annuity option is interesting for some retirees: you give to charity, the charity provides a stream of guaranteed annuity payments back to you for life. The CGA must be from a public charity (the charity itself issues it), not a commercial annuity.
The process.
1. Identify the qualified charity. Confirm 501(c)(3) status (most are publicly listed on IRS.gov tax-exempt organization search).
2. Contact your IRA custodian. Tell them you want to do a QCD. They’ll need: – The charity’s full legal name – The charity’s address – The charity’s EIN if available – The dollar amount
3. The custodian writes a check to the charity from your IRA. Sends it directly to the charity (not to you).
4. The charity sends you a thank-you letter acknowledging the donation. Keep this for your records.
5. The custodian reports the distribution on Form 1099-R for the year. Box 7 distribution code: 7 (normal distribution) or 2 (early distribution if you were younger).
6. On your tax return, report the gross distribution on Form 1040 Line 4a and the taxable portion (the IRA distribution amount LESS the QCD amount) on Line 4b. The QCD portion is excluded.
If the entire IRA distribution for the year was a QCD: Line 4a shows the full amount, Line 4b shows $0. Notation ‘QCD’ next to Line 4b.
Your tax software (TurboTax, etc.) handles this correctly when you indicate the distribution was a QCD.
The direct payment requirement. The QCD must be a direct payment from the IRA custodian to the charity. If you receive the check first and then donate, the QCD treatment is lost. The transaction must flow directly to the charity.
Multi-charity QCDs. You can split the $40K across multiple charities. Tell the custodian to send $10K to charity A, $15K to charity B, $15K to charity C, etc. Each is a separate QCD distribution.
Multi-IRA QCDs. You can do QCDs from any of your traditional IRAs. The aggregate $108K limit applies across all your IRAs.
Timing. QCDs can be done anytime during the year (January through December). They count toward the year’s QCD limit. They are reported on the year’s 1099-R and tax return.
For your specific gap-year strategy (2026, 2027 before RMDs in 2028 at age 73 — assuming your birth year of 1955 means you turn 73 in 2028):
– 2026 (age 71): Do $40K of QCDs (or whatever your charitable giving is). IRA balance reduces by $40K (plus less growth on the distributed amount). – 2027 (age 72): Do $40K-$50K of QCDs again. – 2028 (age 73 — first RMD year): RMD calculation uses December 31, 2027 balance (now lower thanks to QCDs). RMD is correspondingly smaller.
For 2028+ (RMD years): – Continue QCDs at $40K-$50K/year. – Each year’s QCD satisfies the RMD up to the QCD amount. – Excess QCD beyond RMD continues to exclude income.
Over a 25-year retirement (ages 71-95) at $40K/year of QCDs:
Total QCDs: $1,000,000 to charity. Total tax savings vs. taxable distribution + cash donation strategy: $200,000-$350,000 (depending on bracket and state).
That’s a substantial tax savings AND $1M to your chosen charities. The QCD strategy is the most tax-efficient way to give from a traditional IRA.
Under required minimum distribution age 73 rules, the QCD is the standard play for charitably-inclined retirees. Use the gap years to start, continue during the RMD years, and integrate with your overall retirement and estate plan. The strategy is straightforward, the rules are well-established, and the tax benefit is substantial. Engage your CPA to confirm the implementation and reporting each year.
I have IRAs at three different brokerages plus an old 401(k) at a former employer plus my current 401(k) at my still-working job. How do required minimum distribution age 73 rules aggregation work across all these accounts?
Aggregation across multiple retirement accounts is one of the more confusing aspects of the required minimum distribution age 73 rules. Let me work through your specific situation step by step.
The core principle.
There are different aggregation rules for different account types:
– IRAs aggregate with each other (for RMD calculation purposes). – 401(k)s do NOT aggregate with each other (each plan stands alone). – IRAs do NOT aggregate with 401(k)s (different category).
Let me apply this to your situation:
1. Three IRAs at different brokerages: AGGREGATE for RMD purposes. 2. Old 401(k) at former employer: Independent RMD obligation. 3. Current 401(k) at still-working employer: Possibly deferred under the still-working exception (see below).
Step 1: Calculate the IRA RMD across the three accounts.
Get the December 31 prior-year balances: – IRA at Fidelity: let’s say $300,000 – IRA at Schwab: let’s say $250,000 – IRA at Vanguard: let’s say $200,000 – Total IRA balance: $750,000
Apply the Uniform Lifetime Table factor at your age. Let’s assume you’re age 73 with a divisor of 27.4.
IRA RMD = $750,000 / 27.4 = $27,372
The $27,372 can be satisfied from any one (or combination) of the three IRAs. You have flexibility on which account(s) to draw from.
Strategic considerations for which IRA to draw from: – Highest-cost-basis IRA (least growth potential): draw down first to preserve growth in others. – Specific holding to liquidate: distribute from the IRA holding that specific position. – Custodian-specific considerations: some custodians have better automatic RMD systems than others. – Concentration concerns: if one IRA holds a single large position, distribute from a more diversified IRA.
For most retirees, the simplest approach is to set up automatic distributions from one IRA (typically the largest) that satisfies the full RMD. Then leave the other IRAs untouched.
Step 2: Calculate the former employer 401(k) RMD.
Let’s say the old 401(k) balance was $200,000 on December 31 prior year.
401(k) RMD = $200,000 / 27.4 = $7,299
This $7,299 must be taken FROM THE OLD 401(k). You cannot satisfy it from your IRAs. The 401(k) and IRA are separate categories — no cross-aggregation.
Process the 401(k) RMD with the 401(k) plan administrator. Each 401(k) has its own processing — different forms, different timelines, different verification.
Step 3: Determine whether the current 401(k) needs an RMD.
This is where the still-working exception kicks in.
Under IRC §401(a)(9)(C)(i)(II), if you are still working for the employer sponsoring a 401(k) AND you are NOT a 5% or greater owner of the employer, RMDs from THAT specific 401(k) can be deferred until April 1 of the year after you retire.
The exception applies only to the current employer’s 401(k). Doesn’t apply to: – Your IRAs (regardless of work status) – Former employer 401(k)s – Any plan where you’re a 5%+ owner
Conditions to verify:
1. Are you still actively working for the employer? Even part-time qualifies as long as you remain in the employer’s employment.
2. Are you under 5% ownership? You generally are NOT a 5% owner unless you’re a small business owner or family member of one. For most regular employees, this is satisfied.
If both conditions are met: the current 401(k) RMD is deferred. You don’t need to take it until you retire.
Let’s assume both conditions apply. So the current 401(k) RMD is deferred.
Step 4: Calculate the total RMDs for the year.
For your situation: – IRA RMD: $27,372 (from any of the three IRAs) – Former employer 401(k) RMD: $7,299 (from that specific 401(k)) – Current 401(k) RMD: Deferred (still-working exception)
Total required distributions for the year: $34,671
Step 5: Reporting on the tax return.
Form 1040: – Line 4a (IRA distributions, gross): $27,372 (or higher if you took more than the minimum) – Line 4b (IRA distributions, taxable): $27,372 – Line 5a (Pensions and annuities, gross): $7,299 (from the old 401(k)) – Line 5b (Pensions and annuities, taxable): $7,299
Total taxable retirement distributions: $34,671 of ordinary income.
Step 6: Practical execution.
For your three IRAs:
Option A: Take the entire $27,372 from one IRA. Set up automatic distribution at Fidelity (say) for $27,372/year. The other two IRAs stay untouched. Simplest approach.
Option B: Split across the three. Take some from each. More complex bookkeeping but allows you to manage which IRA’s assets are distributed.
Option C: Consolidate first, then distribute. Roll all three IRAs into one IRA at your preferred custodian. Then take the entire $27,372 from the single IRA. Simplifies ongoing management.
The consolidation option is recommended for most retirees. Fewer accounts = simpler tracking, easier RMD compliance, easier beneficiary management. Trustee-to-trustee transfers between IRAs are free and don’t have tax consequences.
For the old 401(k):
Process the $7,299 distribution with the 401(k) administrator. Provide them with your RMD instruction. They’ll typically: – Calculate the RMD based on their records – Distribute the amount before December 31 – Provide Form 1099-R for tax reporting
Consider rolling the old 401(k) into your IRA. This: – Eliminates the separate 401(k) RMD calculation – Adds the 401(k) balance to your IRA aggregation – Increases your aggregate IRA RMD – Simplifies ongoing compliance
For the current 401(k):
Leave it alone. The still-working exception defers RMDs. Track the date you retire — when that happens, the current 401(k) becomes subject to RMDs.
Upon retirement, you’ll have two choices for the current 401(k): – Take RMDs from the 401(k) per the still-working rules (RMD deferred to April 1 of year after retirement, then annual RMDs in subsequent years). – Roll the 401(k) into your IRA (or a new IRA). The rollover combines with the IRA aggregation. From that point, the 401(k) balance is part of the IRA RMD calculation.
The rollover is usually recommended at retirement for the same reasons: simpler tracking, IRA aggregation, broader investment options, often lower fees.
Step 7: Annual review and planning.
Each year: – Get December 31 statements from all retirement accounts. – Calculate the IRA aggregate balance. – Calculate the 401(k) RMD separately (if any non-deferred 401(k) remains). – Calculate the Uniform Lifetime Table factor for your current age. – Verify the RMDs are scheduled or taken. – Update beneficiary designations as needed. – Consider QCDs to reduce taxable income. – Consider Roth conversions to fill bracket capacity.
A spreadsheet helps. Columns for each account, December 31 balance, applicable RMD, status of distribution. Updated annually.
Step 8: When the still-working exception ends.
When you retire from the current employer:
1. The current 401(k) becomes subject to RMD. The first RMD is for the year of retirement, due by April 1 of the year after retirement.
2. If you retire mid-year (say, July 2027), the 2027 first 401(k) RMD is calculated using December 31, 2026 balance, with the Uniform Lifetime Table at your age in 2027. Due April 1, 2028.
3. The 2028 RMD (and subsequent years) follows regular RMD rules — annual distribution by December 31.
4. Or roll the 401(k) to an IRA at the time of retirement. The IRA’s aggregate balance includes the rolled-over amount. Future RMDs reflect the higher IRA balance.
Step 9: Death and beneficiary considerations.
With multiple retirement accounts, beneficiary designations are critical. Each account has its own beneficiary designation that controls upon your death.
Review annually: – Each IRA’s primary and contingent beneficiaries – Each 401(k)’s primary and contingent beneficiaries – Coordinate with your overall estate plan
Upon your death: – Each account’s beneficiaries inherit according to that account’s designation. – IRA beneficiaries subject to the SECURE Act 10-year rule (or EDB rules). – 401(k) beneficiaries similarly subject to 10-year rule. – Multiple beneficiaries can be named (e.g., 50/50 to two children).
For required minimum distribution age 73 rules across multiple accounts, the aggregation rules give you flexibility on IRAs while requiring separate handling for 401(k)s. The still-working exception is a valuable deferral tool while you’re still actively employed. Consolidation reduces complexity but isn’t always optimal (e.g., if a 401(k) has unique features worth preserving). For most retirees with multiple accounts, a CPA’s annual review is the safest approach to confirm full compliance and identify optimization opportunities.
I have $2.5M in traditional IRAs and I'm 72. My CPA suggests Roth conversions before required minimum distribution age 73 rules kick in. How much should I convert, and what are the trade-offs?
Roth conversion planning in the year before RMDs start is one of the most valuable retirement tax moves available. Let me walk through the math and the trade-offs for your specific $2.5M situation.
The core idea.
A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA (taxable at distribution) to a Roth IRA (tax-free at distribution). The conversion itself triggers income tax at your current marginal rate. The benefit: future distributions from the Roth are tax-free, AND there are no lifetime RMDs on the Roth.
For a retiree with substantial traditional IRA balances, conversions before RMDs: – Tax the conversion at the current bracket (often 22-24%). – Avoid taxing future RMDs at potentially higher brackets. – Build a tax-free bucket for life and for beneficiaries. – Reduce future RMD obligations (smaller traditional IRA = smaller RMDs).
Step 1: Map your current tax situation.
At age 72 with $2.5M traditional IRAs: – Other income: pension, Social Security, taxable account distributions, etc. Let’s assume $80,000/year. – Filing status: married filing jointly (MFJ). – Standard deduction (both 65+): $30,750 in 2024 ($32K+ in 2026 indexed). – Federal taxable income (other income only): $80,000 − $30,750 = $49,250. – Marginal federal bracket: 22% (the 22% bracket for MFJ in 2024 was $94,300 to $201,050; you’re below the threshold).
You have approximately $151,800 of room in the 22% bracket ($201,050 top minus $49,250 current taxable income).
Step 2: Decide the conversion amount.
Option A: Fill the 22% bracket. Convert $151,800. Federal tax on the conversion at 22% = $33,396. Plus state tax (varies). Combined effective rate roughly 27-28%.
Option B: Fill the 24% bracket. The 24% bracket for MFJ in 2024 was $201,050 to $383,900. Converting up to the top of 24%: $383,900 − $49,250 = $334,650 conversion. Federal tax: $151,800 × 22% + $182,850 × 24% = $33,396 + $43,884 = $77,280 of federal tax.
Option C: Fill the 32% bracket. Larger conversion. Federal tax stacks 22% + 24% + 32%. Diminishing returns at higher brackets.
My recommendation: Option A or B depending on goals.
If you have other resources to pay the conversion tax (taxable account, cash savings, etc.) without needing to use the IRA for the tax payment: convert up to the top of the 24% bracket. The 24% conversion rate is significantly below the future RMD rate likely (32-37% in your peak RMD years if balances grow).
If paying the conversion tax is a stretch and you’d need to use IRA distributions to pay it: stick with Option A (fill 22% bracket). Avoid drawing down too much IRA in one year.
Step 3: Calculate the long-term comparison.
Let me model two scenarios.
Scenario A: No conversion.
At age 73, RMDs begin. RMD = $2.5M / 27.4 = $91,241.
Federal tax on the RMD layered on $80K other income: brings total to $171K of ordinary income. Federal bracket: 24% (within the $94K-$201K range for MFJ).
Federal tax on the RMD: $91,241 × 24% = $21,898. Plus state.
Over 25 years of RMDs (ages 73-97), cumulative RMDs at growth rate of 5% and average withdrawal rate of 5-7%: roughly $3M-$4M of distributions.
Cumulative federal tax: $700K-$1M.
Final IRA balance at age 97: roughly $1M (still substantial).
Upon death: $1M traditional IRA inherited by non-spouse beneficiaries. SECURE Act 10-year rule. Beneficiaries take the $1M as distributions over 10 years, taxed at their (likely higher) marginal rates. If beneficiaries are in 32% bracket: $1M × 32% = $320K of inherited income tax.
Total lifetime + inheritance federal tax under Scenario A: $700K + $320K ≈ $1M.
Scenario B: Convert $300,000 at age 72, before RMDs.
Federal tax on the conversion (let’s use Option B at 24% rate for the marginal portion): roughly $77K federal + ~$15K state = $92K total tax.
After conversion: – Traditional IRA balance: $2.2M – Roth IRA balance: $300K
RMD on $2.2M at age 73: $2.2M / 27.4 = $80,292. Lower than Scenario A.
Over 25 years of RMDs on the $2.2M traditional balance, cumulative RMDs slightly lower than Scenario A’s $3M-$4M. Roughly $2.6M-$3.5M.
Cumulative federal tax on RMDs: roughly $600K-$850K.
Roth balance over 25 years at 6% growth (untaxed): $300K → $1.29M at age 97.
Upon death: roughly $700K-$900K traditional IRA + $1.29M Roth IRA inherited.
Non-spouse beneficiaries: Traditional taxed at their bracket (32% × ~$800K = $256K). Roth tax-free under 10-year rule.
Total lifetime + inheritance federal tax under Scenario B: $92K conversion + $600K-$850K RMDs + $256K inheritance = $948K-$1.2M.
Very close to Scenario A. The conversion roughly breaks even on total federal tax IF you assume the beneficiary tax rate equals your conversion rate.
The real benefit comes from:
1. Tax rate differential. If your conversion rate (24%) is below your beneficiaries’ rate (32-37%), the conversion saves significantly. The savings = (beneficiary rate − conversion rate) × converted amount. For $300K at 8% rate differential = $24K. For $1M at 8% differential over multiple conversions = $80K savings.
2. Roth growth is more valuable in a vacuum. The Roth grows tax-free for the rest of your life. Traditional balance grows but RMDs come out taxable each year. The Roth wins on net growth rate over time.
3. Estate tax exposure. Roth converted balances are still in your estate for estate tax purposes, but if your beneficiaries are subject to estate tax (your gross estate exceeds the exemption), the conversion shifts wealth from a future-taxable account to a future-tax-free account. The estate tax cost is the same (it’s on the gross estate); the income tax is removed.
4. Surviving spouse considerations. If your spouse is alive when you die, they roll over the Roth tax-free. The Roth continues growing tax-free for the spouse’s lifetime. No RMDs on the Roth either.
Step 4: Multi-year conversion plan.
A single $300K conversion in one year is meaningful but not necessarily optimal. A multi-year conversion strategy spreads the income recognition and keeps you in lower brackets.
Plan over 5 years (ages 72-76):
Year 1 (age 72, pre-RMD): Convert $200K. Total taxable income $280K. Stays in the 22-24% bracket band.
Years 2-5 (ages 73-76, during RMDs): Convert $100K-$150K/year on top of RMDs. RMD plus conversion stays within 24% bracket.
Cumulative conversion over 5 years: $700K. Plus RMDs of $80K-$100K/year for 4 years (ages 73-76) ≈ $360K.
Total traditional IRA balance reduction by age 77: $700K converted + $360K RMD-distributed = $1.06M.
Remaining traditional balance: $1.5M-$1.7M. Roth balance: $700K + growth ≈ $850K.
For a $2.5M starting position, this multi-year conversion shifts a substantial portion to Roth at modest tax rates. The strategic value over the lifetime is significant.
Step 5: Conversion mechanics.
Process: – Tell your IRA custodian to do a direct transfer from traditional IRA to Roth IRA at the same custodian (or different custodian). – The transfer is a ‘Roth conversion.’ Custodian will report it on Form 1099-R with distribution code 2 or 7 and Form 5498 for the receiving Roth IRA. – Tax withholding: typically you’d elect NOT to withhold federal taxes on the conversion (the full converted amount should land in the Roth). Pay the conversion tax from other funds (taxable account, cash). – Reported on Form 1040 Line 4a (gross) and Line 4b (taxable). The full converted amount is taxable.
Five-year rule. Each conversion has its own 5-year holding period. After 5 years, the converted principal can be withdrawn from the Roth without the 10% penalty (if under 59.5 — not relevant for you at 72) and without the 5-year rule restriction. For you at 72+, 5-year rule is mostly relevant for non-spouse beneficiaries inheriting Roth conversions.
Step 6: Watch for income-related gotchas.
Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT). 3.8% on net investment income above $250K AGI (MFJ). Conversion increases AGI. If your conversion pushes you over $250K, NIIT applies to investment income.
Medicare IRMAA surcharges. Higher income in year of conversion = higher Medicare premiums two years later (IRMAA uses 2-year-old MAGI). $200K-$300K income may add $500-$1,500/year to Medicare premiums for one year.
State taxes. State conformity to federal conversion treatment. Most states tax conversions at full state rate. California, New York, Massachusetts charge significant state tax on conversions. Watch for state impact.
Loss of subsidies. ACA marketplace subsidies cap at certain income levels. If still under 65 and on marketplace coverage, conversion can disqualify subsidies (worth $5K-$15K/year). Less relevant at 72 (you’re on Medicare).
Step 7: Cost-benefit analysis.
For your $2.5M IRA, a 5-year multi-year conversion of $700K total:
Cost: $77K × 5 years = ~$385K of federal + state tax over the 5 years (varies with bracket and state).
Benefit: Future RMDs reduced by $700K × 4-5% average = $30K-$35K/year less in RMDs. Over 20+ years, $600K-$700K less in RMD distributions. At 24% bracket: $145K-$170K of federal tax savings.
Plus: $850K Roth balance grows tax-free. After 20 years at 6%, balance grows to $2.7M tax-free.
Plus: Beneficiary tax savings of $200K+ when comparing future inherited Roth distributions to future inherited traditional IRA distributions.
Total lifetime + inheritance tax savings: $500K-$700K compared to no conversion strategy.
Net benefit: $500K-$700K savings vs. $385K cost = $100K-$315K of net family wealth.
My recommendation for your $2.5M situation:
1. Convert $200K-$300K in 2026 (this year, before RMDs start in 2027 at age 73). 2. Continue converting $100K-$150K/year for 4-5 more years through your mid-70s. 3. Pay the conversion tax from your taxable account or cash savings — don’t use the IRA to pay the tax. 4. Total conversion over the strategy: $700K-$900K. 5. Final Roth balance: $850K-$1M+ (depending on conversion size and growth). 6. Remaining traditional IRA: $1.5M-$1.8M (subject to RMDs and continued tax).
For required minimum distribution age 73 rules planning at your level of IRA wealth, the Roth conversion strategy is the standard play. Engage your CPA to model the multi-year tax projection precisely (considering current and projected brackets, state tax, IRMAA exposure, and beneficiary considerations) and execute the plan annually. The savings to your family are substantial.
Related Services
Related Reedcorp Guides
Sources and Further Reading
Need Help With Your Tax Return?
Our New York City CPA team provides individual tax preparation, business management, and strategic advisory.