Rent vs. Buy Calculator
The “should I rent or buy” question is one of the most expensive decisions most people make, and the math is almost never what their parents told them. A good rent vs buy calculator runs the real numbers: down payment, mortgage interest, property tax, insurance, maintenance, closing costs on the way in, closing costs on the way out, and the opportunity cost of every dollar tied up in home equity instead of an S&P 500 index fund. That last piece is where most online tools quietly cheat. Our rent vs buy calculator does not.
In New York City, the answer often surprises people. With 6%-7% mortgage rates in 2026, the NYC mansion tax kicking in at $1M, mortgage recording tax of 1.8%-1.925%, and the $40,400 SALT cap, the buy side carries a heavier load than it did during the 3% rate era. Westchester and the Jersey suburbs change the math again. Run your own numbers below, then read the FAQs for how a New York City CPA firm thinks about this, including the Section 121 home-sale exclusion, the post-TCJA mortgage interest cap, and the cases where a 5-year hold genuinely loses to renting. For a full library of related tools, see our financial calculators hub.
Calculator
Inputs
The math nobody wants to do
The first-instinct comparison is rent vs mortgage payment, and the mortgage usually looks similar or cheaper. That comparison is incomplete. The real comparison has to include property tax (NYC effective rate around 0.9 percent for Class 1, far higher in the suburbs), maintenance (budget 1 percent of home value annually as a long-run average), insurance, HOA if applicable, opportunity cost on the down payment, and selling costs on the back end.
On the rent side, the renter invests the down payment plus any monthly cost savings. Over seven years at a 7 percent expected return, the gap can be enormous.
The five-to-seven year rule
Under five years, transaction costs (typically 7 to 9 percent total: 2 to 3 percent buying, 5 to 6 percent selling) overwhelm any savings or appreciation in most markets. Past seven years, the long amortization of the mortgage means more of each payment goes to principal (equity you keep) instead of interest (rent you pay the bank). The middle range is where the inputs matter most — appreciation assumption, investment return on the rent-and-invest side, and your tax bracket.
In NYC, the rent-vs-buy decision is almost never about pure math. Co-op boards, condo flip taxes, mortgage recording taxes (1.8 to 2.175 percent of the loan), and the mansion tax (1 to 3.9 percent on purchases above $1M) all add friction. We see the numbers from the other side: clients selling primary residences and managing the Section 121 exclusion year over year.
What the calculator ignores
Imputed rent (the value of living in your own home rent-free), the psychological value of stability, the option value of being able to move quickly, life changes that prompt selling early (job, divorce, kids), market timing risk, and the very real possibility that maintenance runs 2 percent or more in older buildings. NYC pre-war buildings eat maintenance budgets for breakfast.
Source on SALT and mortgage interest: IRS Publication 936. NYC transfer tax: NYC RPT page.
Does a rent vs buy calculator factor in mortgage interest deduction and SALT cap?
Can a rent vs buy calculator handle the timing question, ‘is now a good time to buy’?
How do I use a rent vs buy calculator to decide between a 5-year vs 15-year horizon?
Related Services from The Reed Corporation
Helpful Guides You Might Also Like
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a rent vs buy calculator handle the opportunity cost of a down payment invested in stocks?
This is the question that separates a serious rent vs buy calculator from a real estate marketing tool. If you put $200,000 down on a $1 million apartment in Manhattan, that $200,000 is no longer earning a return somewhere else. A serious rent vs buy calculator treats that $200,000 as capital you could have invested in an S&P 500 index fund, which has averaged roughly 10% nominal and 7% real over the long run. Over a 10-year hold, $200,000 compounding at 7% real becomes about $393,000. That foregone $193,000 of growth is a real cost of buying, even though no online listing will ever show it to you.
Most generic online tools either skip opportunity cost entirely or use a token 3%-4% return rate that quietly tilts the answer toward buying. Our rent vs buy calculator lets you set the assumed investment return yourself, and we suggest stress-testing it at three levels: 5% (conservative), 7% (long-run real return on equities), and 9% (closer to nominal). Run all three and watch how the buy vs. rent gap moves. On a 5-year hold in Manhattan, the rent vs buy calculator often shows renting winning by $80,000-$150,000 once the down payment opportunity cost is honest. On a 10-year hold, the gap narrows but does not always reverse, especially in buildings with high common charges or in co-ops with flip taxes.
The math also has to include the difference between the monthly mortgage payment and what you would pay in rent. If your mortgage, taxes, insurance, and common charges run $7,200 a month and a comparable rental is $5,500, the buyer is “paying” $1,700 a month more to live there. A rigorous rent vs buy calculator invests that $1,700-a-month delta in the renter’s side of the ledger at the same return rate. Over 10 years at 7%, that monthly spread grows into about $295,000 of investment value the renter accumulates that the buyer does not. People forget this part. The buyer is not just forgoing the return on the down payment, they are forgoing the return on the monthly cash flow difference too. The two together compound into a number that often exceeds the home equity build-up in the first 7-8 years.
Here is the surprising line: in most NYC scenarios under a 7-year hold, the renter who actually invests the difference comes out ahead of the buyer even after assuming 3% annual home appreciation. The catch is the word “actually.” If the renter spends the difference on a nicer rental or higher lifestyle, the calculator math collapses. A rent vs buy calculator is only useful if you commit to the discipline it assumes. Most renters do not, which is part of why financial advisors quietly still tell clients to buy: the forced savings of a mortgage paydown beats the theoretical return on stocks that the client never actually invests in.
For a deeper look at how compounding works on the renter’s side of the equation, our future value calculator projects what the down payment plus the monthly cash flow delta turns into over 5, 10, 20, and 30-year horizons. Pair the two tools when you are running a serious analysis. The future value calculator will show you that $200,000 plus $1,700 per month at 7% real compounding becomes about $810,000 over 15 years. That is the number to put against the home equity build-up on the buy side. If home equity over the same 15 years builds to $700K (down payment + principal pay-down + appreciation net of selling costs), the renter has actually won on paper, before adding in the flexibility advantage of liquid capital.
One last note on opportunity cost: home equity is illiquid. If your $200,000 down payment is now $300,000 of equity in a Manhattan condo, you cannot use it to fund a business, pay tuition, or weather a job loss without either selling the apartment or taking out a HELOC at current rates. The S&P 500 index fund version of the same $200,000 stays liquid the entire time. A rent vs buy calculator does not show liquidity, but it should be on your mind when you read the output. For younger buyers especially, locking up six figures in an illiquid asset can constrain the next 15 years of career decisions, business launches, and family planning more than the spreadsheet output suggests. A founder who needs $200K of seed capital in year 3 cannot pull it out of the condo without selling or borrowing at HELOC rates that may be 8%+.
If you want a CPA to run these numbers with your actual income, tax bracket, and the specific building you are looking at, our tax strategy consulting service does this work for clients regularly. The rent vs buy calculator gets you 80% of the way; the consult covers the building-specific quirks (flip tax, assessments, sponsor units, mortgage recording tax) that a generic tool cannot model. We see clients every season who thought they were getting a deal on a co-op, then discovered the building had a 2% flip tax and a looming assessment for facade repairs, both of which would have shown up if the rent vs buy calculator was run with real building data instead of generic assumptions. The opportunity cost piece is the single biggest variable, but the building-level quirks are where the next-biggest surprises live.
Why does a rent vs buy calculator favor renting in Manhattan but buying in Westchester?
The same buyer with the same income, the same down payment, and the same return assumptions will see a rent vs buy calculator point them toward renting in Manhattan and buying in Westchester roughly 70% of the time. The reason comes down to four numbers that almost nobody outside the industry understands: closing costs, monthly carrying costs, the rent-to-price ratio, and the flip tax. Each one moves the calculator output by tens of thousands of dollars over a 5-10 year hold, and they all move in the same direction.
Start with closing costs. Buying in Manhattan typically runs 5%-7% of the purchase price for closing costs on the way in. The big-ticket items: NY mortgage recording tax of 1.8% on loans under $500K and 1.925% on loans of $500K+; mansion tax of 1% on purchases over $1M scaling up to 3.9% over $25M; title insurance running 0.4%-0.8%; attorney fees of $3,000-$6,000; and various small bank and lender fees. On a $1.2 million purchase, that is $60,000-$84,000 just to get the keys. Then on the way out, expect 8%-9% in sell-side costs: 5%-6% broker commission, 1.4% NY State transfer tax + 1%-2.625% NYC RPTT depending on price, plus attorney fees and the building flip tax (1%-3% of sale price in most co-ops, sometimes condos too). Round trip, you are losing 13%-16% of the purchase price to transaction costs alone. The home has to appreciate 13%-16% before you break even, before you have made a single dollar of real return.
Westchester is cheaper on both ends. No mortgage recording tax above the state level (the special 0.3% NYC piece does not apply), no mansion tax (that is NYC-specific at the city level, though NY State does have its own version), no NYC RPTT, and most properties are single-family homes without a flip tax. Round-trip transaction costs are closer to 9%-11%. The break-even point is faster, sometimes by 2-3 years on the same purchase price. That 2-3 year break-even acceleration is the single biggest reason the rent vs buy calculator flips in the suburbs, even before you get to property tax and rent ratios.
Then the monthly numbers. A Manhattan condo at $1.2M typically has common charges of $1.50-$4.00 per square foot per month, so a 900-square-foot two-bedroom might run $1,500-$3,600 a month on top of the mortgage and property tax. NYC Class 1 effective property tax is about 0.85%, lower than most people assume, but co-ops and condos in Class 2 have higher effective rates that the 17.5%-28.1% co-op/condo abatement only partially offsets. The buyer’s all-in monthly carrying cost on a $1.2M place can run $8,500-$10,000.
Westchester turns this upside down. Common charges do not exist for single-family homes. Property tax is higher (2%-2.7% effective in many towns), but there are no common charges, no flip tax, and you typically get more space for the dollar. A $900,000 Westchester home might carry at $7,000-$8,000 a month all-in, which is less than the Manhattan condo for a much bigger property. And rents in Westchester for a comparable single-family home often exceed $5,500-$6,500 a month, so the rent-to-price ratio is much friendlier to buying. The shorthand financial advisors use is the “rent multiplier”: divide purchase price by annual rent. Manhattan condos often trade at 30x-40x annual rent. Westchester single-family homes often trade at 18x-25x. Below 20x, the rent vs buy calculator usually says buy. Above 30x, it usually says rent.
Here is the surprising line: on a 5-year hold in Manhattan, the rent vs buy calculator shows renting beating buying about 80% of the time once you include the round-trip closing costs and the SALT cap. On a 5-year hold in Westchester, the same buyer with the same financials wins about 60% of the time by buying. The geography matters more than the income, the rate, or the down payment percentage. This is why a rent vs buy calculator that does not let you input transaction costs and monthly common charges by zip code is producing fiction.
For clients who work in Manhattan and are deciding whether to commute from a suburb, this is often the central question. Our real estate clients see this play out every week: the buyer who could “barely afford” Manhattan turns out to easily afford Westchester or northern New Jersey, and the math actually favors them buying. The property tax calculator is the right next stop after running the rent vs buy calculator, because property tax dominates the suburban cost picture in a way it does not for Manhattan condo buyers shielded by the co-op/condo abatement. The commute calculation (cost, time, and quality of life) is the soft variable the calculator cannot include, but for a family in their 30s, the trade often makes sense even before the financial math.
One last wrinkle: New Jersey adds a 1% realty transfer fee on the seller side at most price points, and at $1M+ adds a 1% mansion tax on the buyer side. Northern New Jersey is closer to NYC closing cost math than people realize. Hoboken and Jersey City buyers should run the rent vs buy calculator with NJ-specific transaction costs, not the lower numbers from the rest of the state. The rent vs buy calculator answer for Hoboken often falls between Manhattan (rent) and Westchester (buy): borderline at 5 years, leans buy at 8+ years. For Long Island and the lower Hudson Valley, the math more cleanly favors buying once you have a 7+ year horizon, because transaction costs come back down and property tax becomes the dominant variable rather than closing costs.