NEW YORK CITY

IRS Audit & Refund Notice Assistance for Expats in New York City

A notice about an unreported foreign account is a different kind of fear than a routine audit letter, because the penalties attached to it are measured against your account balances rather than your tax. We represent New York City expats facing IRS examinations, FBAR and foreign-asset penalty notices, and the quiet realization that years of foreign accounts were never reported. The path forward depends almost entirely on one question, whether the failure was willful or not, and for the large majority of expats who simply did not know the rules there is a defined catch-up program that resolves the past without the ruinous penalties. New York adds its own layer, because the city does not stop taxing a domiciliary who moved abroad.

Why foreign-account penalties are different

An ordinary tax deficiency is a percentage of tax you underpaid. A foreign-asset penalty is not, and that is what makes these notices frightening. A non-willful FBAR penalty can reach $10,000 per violation, and a willful failure can reach the greater of $100,000 or half the account balance, per year, so a long-unreported account can in theory draw penalties exceeding the money in it. Form 8938, Form 5471, and the other international forms carry their own $10,000-and-up penalties that apply whether or not any tax was due. This is why a foreign-account notice cannot be handled like a normal audit response, and why the willful-versus-non-willful question dominates everything. The good news is that most expats who fell behind did so without any intent to hide anything, and that fact, properly documented, opens a far gentler resolution. We assess where you stand and represent you through tax controversy and audit response so you are not facing the notice alone.

The IRS catch-up program for non-willful filers

For an expat whose failure to file was non-willful, the IRS maintains a dedicated catch-up program for U.S. persons living abroad, and it is the single most important tool in this area. Under the offshore version for taxpayers residing outside the United States, you file three years of amended or delinquent returns and six years of FBARs, pay the tax and interest on any income that was unreported, and certify under penalty of perjury that the failures were non-willful. In exchange, the program waives the FBAR and foreign-asset penalties entirely for qualifying taxpayers abroad, turning a potentially six-figure penalty exposure into the back tax plus interest and nothing more. The certification is the heart of it, and it has to be truthful and well-supported, because the relief depends on the non-willful facts being real. This program is the reason most expats should never make a noisy correction or simply start filing going forward, both of which forfeit the protection. We evaluate eligibility, assemble the filings, and draft the non-willful certification with the care it requires.

The New York City exposure inside a catch-up

Here is what an expat cleaning up federal back-filings cannot overlook, because it can be the larger number. New York does not conform to the federal foreign earned income exclusion, and New York treats a domiciliary as a resident even while abroad, so if your permanent home stayed in one of the five boroughs the city has been taxing your worldwide income throughout the years you are now correcting, with a rate up to 3.876% on top of state tax. The federal catch-up program addresses the IRS, but it does nothing about New York. An expat amending three federal years might find that for each of those years New York can also claim tax on the full foreign salary the federal return excluded. On a $130,000 excluded salary the New York City portion alone is roughly $5,039 per year before state tax, so three open years can mean a five-figure New York liability sitting behind the federal fix. We quantify the New York exposure as part of the cleanup and determine whether breaking domicile or the 548-day foreign-residence rule reduces it for the open and future years.

What New York City Expats Get With Our IRS Audit Help

For New York City expats, IRS audit help is not a form-filling exercise. We look at how the money actually moves, keep the records clean, and plan ahead so April holds no surprises.

Good irs audit help for expats in New York City starts with clean records and a CPA who reads them closely. When it is time to file, irs audit help for expats in New York City done right means fewer questions and a defensible return. For many clients, irs audit help for expats in New York City is the difference between a stressful April and a calm one.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does IRS audit help for expats in New York City actually cover?

Most mail from the IRS is not an audit. The agency issues millions of automated notices a year, and the bulk of them are matching letters that compare what you reported against what a payer reported about you. An American who moved from Brooklyn to Berlin and kept a brokerage account in the United States is a frequent recipient, usually because a form went to an address she left in 2019. The first step is finding the notice number in the upper right corner and reading the IRS page on understanding your IRS notice or letter, which explains what the letter is and what response the agency wants. A CP2000 proposing more tax is not a bill and not a final word. It is a proposal that you can accept or contest in writing, and the reply deadline printed on the first page governs everything that comes after it.

From there the work runs on two tracks. The factual track rebuilds the year from source records and lines those records up against the IRS version of your account. That means pulling wage and income transcripts through Get Transcript and requesting older years on Form 4506-T. Every line the examiner questions gets tied back to a document that existed at the time. The procedural track holds the deadline and does the talking, so a client eight time zones away is not taking an examiner call at four in the morning. A power of attorney on Form 2848 is what makes that possible. Clean records shorten both tracks, which is why an examination engagement often opens with a bookkeeping cleanup of the years under review and a fresh read of the filed individual tax returns before anyone writes to the agency.

A New York history adds a second layer. New York State and New York City do not simply adopt a federal result, and the state runs examinations of its own. A New York City resident pays a city income tax near 3.876 percent on top of a state rate that reaches about 10.9 percent in the upper brackets, so a federal change of any size usually drags a state and city change behind it. The New York Department of Taxation and Finance also runs residency examinations built on the 183-day count and on whether you kept a permanent place of abode in the city. Plenty of expats keep the apartment and let a cousin stay in it. That single fact can pull a full year of foreign salary back into the New York base even when the federal return sailed through untouched.

The arithmetic makes the point. Say a CP2000 proposes 12,000 dollars of extra tax because a broker reported gross sale proceeds with no cost basis attached. The real gain is often a small slice of those proceeds, and once the purchase confirmations go in, the proposed adjustment can fall to a few hundred dollars or disappear entirely. The common mistake is silence. An expat sees a domestic reply deadline, assumes international mail delay excuses a late answer, and lets the proposal default into an assessment that is far harder to undo than it was to answer. Reply to the letter even if the reply is a request for more time. Clients who want a plan for the open year and for the returns sitting behind it can request a consultation, and the records that close this examination usually keep the next several filing seasons quiet.

How should an American living abroad respond to an IRS notice or letter?

Slowly, in writing, and before the date printed on the page. The IRS opens contact by mail, never by a phone call demanding immediate payment and never by text message, so a message arriving any other way deserves suspicion rather than a reply. Start by matching the notice number against the IRS index of notices and letters. A math error notice and a document request want completely different answers, and the letter itself tells you which one you are holding. If the letter says a refund is being held back, the IRS refunds page shows where the return actually sits, and that is worth checking before assuming the worst. Note the deadline, then work backward from it. Mail from a foreign country moves slowly and the deadline does not care.

Next, separate the money question from the correspondence question, because they travel on different timetables. If part of the proposed tax is genuinely owed, interest keeps accruing while a dispute is open, so paying the undisputed slice early and contesting the rest is often the cheaper path. Direct Pay moves money from a U.S. bank account without a fee, which matters because foreign bank transfers to the Treasury are awkward and slow. When the balance is out of reach in one payment, the online payment agreement application or Form 9465 opens an installment agreement while the substantive fight continues in parallel. Paying is not agreeing, and a payment does not concede the position.

Practical mechanics matter more abroad than they do at home. Send the response by a method that creates a record, and keep the certified mail receipt or the fax confirmation page in the same folder as the notice. Put the notice number and the taxpayer identification number on every page you send, because incoming correspondence is sorted by machine long before a human reads a word of it. Update the address of record the moment you move, since the agency is entitled to treat mail sent to your last known address as delivered whether or not it ever reached you in Madrid. If the deadline genuinely cannot be met, ask for more time before it passes rather than after, then confirm that conversation in a short letter the same week.

The state layer is the part of IRS audit help for expats in New York City that clients underestimate most. New York receives federal adjustment data and runs its own matching program on a lag, so a federal letter answered in March can produce a state letter in the autumn about the same item. Reading the New York Department of Taxation and Finance notice with the same care is the only way to keep the two files consistent, and inconsistent stories between the federal and the state response are how a narrow question turns into a broad one. Answer both with the same documents and the same explanation.

Here is the worked version. A freelance designer in Lisbon, still domiciled in Manhattan on paper, receives a notice showing 12,000 dollars due for a year in which she reported her consulting income but forgot a small severance payment. She pays the 3,000 dollars attributable to the severance through Direct Pay, disputes the remaining 9,000 dollars of proposed adjustments with contracts and bank records, and the file closes in four months. The common mistake is answering by phone and keeping no record of the call. Everything the agency accepted came from paper, not from a conversation. Put the argument in writing, keep the proof of mailing, and next year the same evidence file answers the next letter in an afternoon rather than a quarter.

Why does IRS audit help for expats in New York City start with Form 2848 and transcripts?

Because nobody can defend a return without knowing what the IRS believes about it. Client memory is a poor substitute for the account itself. The agency keeps a record of every document filed under a taxpayer identification number, every assessment posted, and every date that starts or stops a statute of limitations, and none of that is visible from a copy of the return in a desk drawer. Pulling the account through Get Transcript shows what the agency actually has. Older years, which fall outside the online window, come through Form 4506-T, and that request routinely surfaces returns the client had forgotten filing during a year spent partly overseas.

The power of attorney does a different job. Form 2848 names a representative for specific tax years and specific form types, which means it has to be drafted for the actual dispute rather than copied from a template. Get the year range wrong and the representative cannot speak about the year in question. Once it is on file, the examiner calls the representative, the mail copies the representative, and a taxpayer in Singapore stops being the bottleneck on a domestic clock. That single filing removes the most common cause of a defaulted deadline, which is a letter sitting unopened in a New York mailbox for six weeks.

The account transcript also carries information no return copy holds. It gives the date the return posted, which is what starts the ordinary three-year assessment period and tells you whether a longer period applies because of a substantial omission of income. Every penalty appears with the reason code behind it, and that code decides whether a first-time abatement is even available to ask for. For a taxpayer abroad the transcript answers one more question that comes up constantly, which is whether a return the client remembers signing ever actually arrived. A surprising share of expat problems turn out to be an unfiled year rather than a wrong one, and that changes the entire response.

A wage and income transcript frequently rewrites the theory of the case. One client was certain his year was clean. The transcript listed a Form 1099-R reporting 12,000 dollars from an old retirement account, coded as a fully taxable distribution rather than as the trustee to trustee rollover it truly was. He had never seen the form because it went to a Queens address he had not used in years. The fix was a letter with the receiving custodian statement attached and no tax at all, but without the transcript he would have paid 12,000 dollars of phantom income tax with a penalty on top of it.

The common mistake is starting the argument before reading the account. People write long explanatory letters about items the IRS never questioned and stay quiet about the one line that triggered the notice. Order the transcripts first, then reconcile them against the books, and a bookkeeping record that already ties to the filed individual tax returns turns a three-month exchange into a single response. Doing this at the opening of an engagement rather than in the middle of one also tells you how many years are genuinely open, and that answer shapes every decision that follows.

Should an expat file an amended return on Form 1040-X during an examination?

Sometimes, and almost never as a reflex. Form 1040-X corrects a filed Form 1040, and it is the right tool when a return was wrong in a way the notice did not raise. It is the wrong tool when it is being used to answer a letter. An examiner working a CP2000 wants a signed response to the proposal, not a new return dropped into a processing pipeline that runs on a different track and a different timetable. Filing one mid-examination without telling the examiner produces two open files about one year, and the two files rarely agree with each other.

Timing controls the money. A refund claim generally has to arrive within three years of the original filing date or two years of the date the tax was paid, whichever is later, and a claim that lands a week past that window is worth nothing no matter how correct it is. Expats lose real dollars to this rule because they file late by habit, sometimes under an extension and sometimes under the automatic extension available to a taxpayer living abroad. Check the actual filing date on the account transcript before assuming the year is still open. The IRS page on when to file sets out the ordinary deadlines that the clock runs from.

There is a sequencing rule worth stating plainly. Answer the notice on the notice track, correct the return on the return track, and tell the examiner in writing that both are moving. Good IRS audit help for expats in New York City is mostly about keeping those two tracks from colliding, because an amended return filed quietly during an open examination usually gets absorbed into the exam anyway and simply slows it down. Where the amendment relates to the very item under review, the examiner can often take the corrected figures directly, which is faster than processing a separate form and avoids a duplicate assessment. Where it relates to a different year, file it on its own and keep the paperwork apart so nothing gets cross-filed.

A worked example shows when it earns its cost. A New York software engineer working in Amsterdam filed his own return, reported the consulting side of his income on Schedule C, and claimed almost no expenses because he assumed foreign costs did not count. They did. An amended return added roughly 12,000 dollars of documented business expenses, which cut the self-employment tax and the income tax together. The amendment worked because it stood on its own facts, was coordinated openly with the examiner handling a separate item, and rested on receipts assembled before the form was signed.

New York adds a rule people miss. A resident who agrees to a final federal change must report that change to the state within a short window set by state law, and the New York Department of Taxation and Finance assesses the matching state and city tax whether or not the taxpayer sends the notification. The common mistake is fixing the federal year and ignoring the New York year, then meeting the state adjustment two years later with interest attached. Correct both, keep the numbers identical across the filings, and a tax strategy review of the remaining open years usually reveals whether the same error repeated. No return is beyond an audit, but a corrected year that matches its own records is a short conversation.

What documentation keeps an expat examination short?

The kind you gathered before anyone asked. An examination is a documentation contest and nothing else, and the taxpayer carries the burden on nearly every deduction claimed. The IRS recordkeeping guidance sets the floor, and the floor sits higher than most people assume. A bank statement showing money leaving an account proves that money left an account. It does not prove what the payment bought or why the purchase belonged to the business. Pair every meaningful outflow with the invoice or the contract behind it while you still remember what it was, because a receipt in Portuguese from three years ago is a puzzle even to the person who paid it.

Certain files matter more for someone living abroad. Cost basis records top the list, since brokers report proceeds reliably and basis unreliably on older lots, and IRS Publication 551 explains how basis is established and adjusted over time. Investment income rules sit in Publication 550, which matters because a foreign account statement rarely arrives in a format an examiner recognizes. Then there is the day count. A contemporaneous calendar of physical presence, backed by boarding passes and entry stamps, is the difference between winning and losing a New York residency question under the 183-day rule that the New York Department of Taxation and Finance applies to anyone who kept an abode in the city.

Retention length deserves its own thought. The ordinary assessment window runs three years from filing, but a substantial omission of income stretches it to six, and records supporting the basis of an asset have to survive until three years after the year the asset is finally sold. For an apartment bought in 2011 and sold in 2031 that means roughly twenty years of paperwork. The safest rule for someone who changes countries is a single encrypted archive that travels with you, organized by year, holding the filed return alongside the documents that support each line of it. Paper sitting in a storage unit in New Jersey is the same as no paper at all on the morning an examiner asks for it.

The worked example is painful and common. A stylist splitting the year between Milan and the Upper West Side claimed 12,000 dollars of travel and equipment costs against her consulting income. Every dollar was genuinely spent. She had bank entries for all of it and receipts for a third of it, so the examiner allowed the third that was documented and disallowed the rest, which cost her roughly 4,000 dollars in tax and penalty for expenses she actually incurred. Reconstruction after the fact rarely persuades anyone, and vendors abroad are not obliged to reissue paperwork for a customer from 2023.

The common mistake is treating records as a filing-season chore rather than a standing habit. Effective IRS audit help for expats in New York City depends far more on what exists in the file than on how the letter is written, and no argument recovers a receipt that was never kept. Scan as you go, store everything in one place that survives an international move, and reconcile monthly through a bookkeeping routine that already feeds the individual tax returns. Do that and the next notice becomes a request you answer in an afternoon, with the years ahead protected by the same discipline.

Contact Us