HomeWho We ServeAthletesAustin › Investment Coordination
AUSTIN

Investment Coordination for Athletes in Austin

A short earning window funding a long retirement is the defining money problem of a pro athletic career, and the tax treatment of what you set aside shapes how much of it survives. We coordinate with your financial advisor so the investment side and the tax side move together rather than working against each other, reading how deferred compensation, retirement accounts, and taxable investment income interact with your duty-day wages and your endorsement earnings. The Austin base earns its place here, because Texas has no personal income tax, so investment income and deferred comp received as a Texas resident face no state tax, leaving the federal picture and the away-game states as the only moving parts to plan around.

Coordinating the tax side with your investment plan

We do not manage your portfolio, your financial advisor does that, and we coordinate so the tax consequences of the plan are understood before decisions are made rather than discovered at filing. An athlete’s investable income shows up in a hurry, a signing bonus, peak salary years, a large endorsement deal, and the choices about where that money goes carry tax weight. Retirement contributions reduce current taxable income, taxable brokerage accounts generate dividends and gains that get taxed yearly, and the timing of selling a position can land a gain in a high-bracket year or a low one. We sit between your advisor and your return so the asset location and the realization timing reflect your actual tax situation. For an Austin athlete one whole layer falls away, because Texas has no income tax, so a capital gain or a dividend that would carry state tax for an athlete in California or New York carries none here, which means the planning is federal only and the bracket management is cleaner.

Deferred compensation and where it gets taxed

Deferred compensation is one of the most valuable and most misunderstood pieces of an athlete’s finances, and its sourcing turns on where you live when it pays out. Money deferred during your playing years and received in retirement is generally taxed by the state where you reside when you receive it, not where you earned it, under a federal rule that protects retirement income from the states you used to work in. That makes residency at payout the whole ballgame. An athlete who defers heavily during peak earning years and then receives that deferred comp while a Texas resident pays no state income tax on it, because Texas has no personal income tax, even though the income was earned partly in states that do tax. Consider $1,000,000 of deferred comp paid out over ten years to a retired athlete living in Austin. The federal tax applies, but no state income tax does, where the same payout to a California resident could face that state’s top rate on every dollar. We coordinate the deferral and payout timing with your advisor so the structure takes full advantage of the Texas residency.

The 3.8 percent investment income tax and your reserve

As your portfolio grows, a federal surtax enters the picture that a lot of athletes do not see coming. The net investment income tax adds 3.8 percent on top of regular tax on investment income, dividends, interest, capital gains, and rental income, once your modified adjusted gross income passes $200,000 for a single filer or $250,000 for a married couple. A high-earning athlete clears those thresholds easily on salary alone, so nearly all of the investment income stacks the extra 3.8 percent. On $200,000 of capital gains and dividends in a year, that surtax is $7,600 on top of the ordinary capital-gains tax, and it is purely federal, because Texas has no income tax and therefore no state surtax to match it. We build that 3.8 percent into the tax reserve so a strong investment year does not produce a balance-due surprise, and we coordinate with your advisor on the timing of realizations so gains are taken in years where the overall bracket and the surtax exposure are managed rather than maximized.

How we work with you

We start by talking with your financial advisor and reading your last two years of returns so we understand both the portfolio and the tax picture it sits inside. From there we coordinate on the pieces that carry tax weight, the asset location across retirement and taxable accounts, the timing of any large realization, the deferred compensation schedule, and the reserve for the 3.8 percent investment income tax. We fold the investment income into the federal estimate so the quarterly payments cover it, with 2026 dates of April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15, 2027, and because Texas has no income tax there is no state estimate to run alongside them. We do not move your money or place trades, your advisor does that, we make sure the tax consequences are known before the move and reported correctly after. When you are ready, submit a new client inquiry and we will set up the coordination from there.

How Our Investment Coordination Works for Athletes in Austin

We handle investment coordination for Austin athletes from first document to filed return, so nothing falls through the cracks. A CPA reviews the numbers, flags what matters, and answers questions in plain language.

Ask us how investment coordination for athletes in Austin fits your own situation and we will map out the next steps. Good investment coordination for athletes in Austin starts with clean records and a CPA who reads them closely. When it is time to file, investment coordination for athletes in Austin done right means fewer questions and a defensible return.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does The Reed Corporation provide investment management as part of investment coordination for athletes in Austin?

No. The Reed Corporation is a CPA and tax firm. We are not a registered investment adviser. We do not manage portfolios, we do not pick securities, we do not sell financial products, and we do not provide investment management in the advisory sense that the securities laws describe. Nobody at this firm will tell a professional athlete which fund to buy or when to exit a position. That judgment belongs to the athlete’s own licensed advisers, and we are content to sit beside them rather than in their chair. The phrase investment coordination for athletes in Austin therefore carries a narrow meaning on this page. It describes the tax-side work that happens around investment activity someone else is directing, and nothing more than that.

The practical shape of the work is document control and tax arithmetic. The adviser trades. The custodian issues paperwork. We read the paperwork. That means the Form 1099-DIV that splits ordinary dividends from qualified dividends, the Form 1099-INT covering taxable and tax exempt interest, and the Form 1099-R behind any retirement distribution. We tie those documents to Form 8949 and Schedule D, then test the result against the reporting rules in Publication 550. When a number looks wrong, and one usually does in a first year, we go back to the custodian for a corrected statement rather than to the adviser with a trading opinion.

Here is what the line between the two roles looks like in practice. Say an athlete’s adviser rebalances in October and books 12,000 dollars of short term gain across two accounts. Short term gain is taxed at ordinary rates, and the athlete already sits in the top bracket on salary and endorsement money. That same 12,000 dollars also lifts modified adjusted gross income further above the Net Investment Income Tax threshold, so it picks up another 3.8 percent on Form 8960. We cannot undo the trade and we would not ask anyone to. What we can do is raise the fourth quarter payment on Form 1040-ES so April holds no surprise, then tell the adviser what a similar move costs in tax next time so the decision gets made with full information in hand.

The common mistake is assuming the wealth adviser and the CPA already talk to each other. Almost always they do not, unless somebody builds the habit on purpose. The athlete signs a management agreement, the adviser runs the account well by investment standards, and the tax bill lands in April as news. The repair is unglamorous. Statements flow to us on a monthly cadence through our bookkeeping work, a mid year review happens through tax strategy consulting, and the finished numbers hand off cleanly into the spring filing without a scramble.

Austin helps the arithmetic. Texas imposes no state personal income tax, so portfolio income does not carry a second state layer on top of the federal number, which is a real advantage over a teammate living in California or New York. An athlete’s business entity may still owe the Texas franchise tax through the Texas Comptroller, and that is a separate conversation we handle. We also watch the road schedule, because games played in other states create nonresident filings even for a Texas resident, and those returns interact with the federal investment numbers. As careers stretch longer and portfolios grow denser, this coordination gets more valuable each year, not less.

What does investment coordination for athletes in Austin actually include during the tax year?

It starts before the year does. The first task is an inventory of everything that will throw off a tax document: every taxable brokerage account, every retirement plan, every private placement, and every real estate interest held directly or through a partnership. Athletes accumulate accounts the way other people accumulate frequent flyer programs, often one per adviser, one per agent introduction, one per team city. Digital asset accounts belong on the same register, because a crypto position sold through an exchange still reports as a capital transaction and still needs a basis figure. We build a single register of custodians and account numbers, then confirm mailing and login access so the January documents actually reach us. This sounds clerical, and it is. It is also the one step that most reliably prevents an amended return in August.

Next comes the quarterly rhythm. Portfolio income carries no withholding the way a paycheck does, so it has to be funded through estimates. We model the year using the safe harbor rules described in Publication 505, pay through Form 1040-ES or IRS Direct Pay, and watch whether the year is drifting toward an underpayment penalty computed on Form 2210. The prior year tax figure comes off the filed return, which is why we pull it before the first payment is due rather than guessing at it. For an athlete whose team withholding is already large, we often lean on extra withholding instead of estimates, because withholding counts as paid evenly across the year even when it actually lands in December.

A worked example shows why timing matters. An athlete’s adviser sells a concentrated position in August and realizes 12,000 dollars of gain, and then a private fund issues a Schedule K-1 in September carrying another 12,000 dollars of ordinary income. Neither event withheld a cent. If the athlete’s prior year tax was 400,000 dollars, the safe harbor is 110 percent of that figure, so the repair is arithmetic rather than drama. We raise the September and January payments, write down the reason in the file, and the return the following April simply reports what already happened.

Mid year is where the coordination earns its keep. We sit with the athlete’s adviser and the agent, walk through realized and unrealized positions, and flag what has tax consequence before December closes the window. We put that meeting on the calendar in June rather than waiting for somebody to raise a hand. If a loss carryforward exists, the adviser should know its size before selling a winner. If charitable intent exists, appreciated stock held long term usually beats writing a check. None of that is an investment recommendation. It is tax information handed to the person who does make the investment call. An athlete who wants that structure built once and then maintained can Request Private Consultation, and we will map the accounts, the reporting calendar, and the estimate schedule in a single sitting.

The common mistake is treating the tax return as the coordination. By the time we are typing numbers onto Form 1040, every decision has been made and the only choice left is accuracy. Real investment coordination for athletes in Austin happens in June and October, not in April. Our tax strategy consulting work exists for exactly that window, and the individual tax return service records the outcome afterward. Build the calendar now and next January turns into a filing exercise instead of a search party.

How does the Net Investment Income Tax on Form 8960 affect a professional athlete’s portfolio income?

The Net Investment Income Tax is a flat 3.8 percent that sits on top of regular income tax. It applies to the smaller of two numbers: net investment income for the year, or the amount by which modified adjusted gross income exceeds a fixed threshold. Those thresholds are 200,000 dollars for a single filer and 250,000 dollars for a married couple filing jointly, and Congress never indexed them for inflation. For a professional athlete the threshold test is almost never the limiter. Salary alone clears it within the first weeks of a season, which means nearly every dollar of investment income carries the full 3.8 percent. The computation lives on Form 8960.

What counts as net investment income is broader than most people expect. Interest reported on Form 1099-INT, dividends on Form 1099-DIV, capital gains carried through Schedule D, rent, royalties, annuity income, and passive business income all land in the bucket. Wages do not, and neither does income from a trade or business in which the athlete materially participates. Publication 550 walks through the classification of investment income, and Publication 925 governs whether a business interest counts as passive, which is the question that decides whether a restaurant stake or a real estate deal gets pulled into the tax at all.

Run the numbers. An athlete files jointly, reports 3,000,000 dollars of salary and endorsement income, and receives 12,000 dollars of dividends plus 40,000 dollars of long term gain. Modified adjusted gross income sails past 250,000 dollars, so the tax applies to the full 52,000 dollars of investment income. The extra levy is about 1,976 dollars, and the 12,000 dollars of dividends alone contributes roughly 456 dollars of it. Qualified dividends still get the preferential rate for regular tax purposes, but that preferential rate does not exempt them from the 3.8 percent. Both taxes apply to the same dollars at the same time.

The common mistake is believing the tax can be dodged by holding positions longer. Long term treatment lowers the regular rate. It does nothing at all to the Net Investment Income Tax. The second common mistake is forgetting the deduction side of Form 8960, where allocable investment interest expense, state income tax properly allocated to investment income, and certain fees reduce the base. We also check whether income the athlete treats as business income is really passive, because that reclassification can pull an entire partnership distribution into the base. Texas residents have no state income tax to allocate, so an Austin athlete has one fewer deduction lever than a Los Angeles athlete, though the Austin athlete is far ahead on the total bill.

Where planning genuinely moves the number is in the shape of the income, and that is a conversation among the athlete, the adviser, and us. Municipal bond interest sits outside the base. Retirement account growth sits outside the base until distribution, and the distributions themselves are excluded from this tax even though they raise modified adjusted gross income for other purposes. We do not recommend any of those products. We price the tax outcome and hand it back. Our tax strategy consulting team runs this projection each October, and the result flows into the individual tax return the following spring. The projection takes about an hour once the account register exists. Model it early and the 3.8 percent stops being an annual surprise.

Why does cost basis tracking matter so much when an athlete holds accounts at several custodians?

Basis is the number that decides how much of a sale is taxable. Get it wrong and the athlete either overpays or files a return that will not survive document matching. Publication 551 sets out how basis is determined for purchased property, gifted property, and inherited property, and each of those paths produces a different answer. Purchased stock takes cost plus commissions. Gifted stock generally carries the donor’s basis forward. Inherited stock usually steps up to value at the date of death. An athlete who received shares from a family member and an athlete who bought the identical shares face very different math on the same sale price.

Multiple custodians make it harder. Brokers report basis to the IRS for covered securities, meaning most stock acquired after 2010 and most fund shares after 2012. For anything older, or for assets transferred in kind from another firm, the broker may report sale proceeds and leave the basis box empty or flagged as not reported. That gap lands on the athlete, not the broker. We reconstruct those numbers from old confirmations and account histories, then report the sale correctly on Form 8949 with the proper adjustment code before it totals onto Schedule D. Old confirmations are only available from a prior custodian for a limited number of years, which is why we ask for them early instead of after a sale. Publication 550 covers the wash sale rules that also cross account lines.

A worked example. An athlete sells a block of stock for 60,000 dollars. The broker reports proceeds of 60,000 dollars and no basis, because the shares arrived through a transfer from a prior firm. If nothing is done, the return effectively reports 60,000 dollars of gain. The real basis, reconstructed from statements, is 48,000 dollars, so the actual gain is 12,000 dollars. At a 23.8 percent combined federal rate including the Net Investment Income Tax, correcting that single line saves about 11,424 dollars. The broker was not wrong to leave the box blank. The reporting rules simply do not require basis on shares it never sold to the athlete.

The common mistake is trusting the year end consolidated statement without checking it. Basis errors are ordinary, especially after a transfer between custodians, a stock split, a spinoff, a return of capital distribution, or a dividend reinvestment plan that quietly creates dozens of small lots. The second common mistake is the wash sale that spans two accounts. The rule looks at the taxpayer, not the account, so a loss harvested at one broker and repurchased inside another broker’s account within thirty days gets disallowed and rolled into the basis of the replacement shares. Nothing in either custodian’s software catches that.

This is why we keep a running lot level record rather than rebuilding history every March. Our bookkeeping group maintains the schedule alongside the athlete’s business books, and the individual tax return pulls from a source that has been verified all year. We reconcile the lot schedule against each custodian’s records once a quarter so nothing drifts. When the athlete eventually retires and starts unwinding concentrated positions, that record is the difference between a clean sale and a research project. Start the file in the first professional year and it stays accurate for the whole career.

How do retirement accounts fit the tax picture for an Austin athlete with a short earning window?

A professional career compresses a lifetime of earnings into a handful of years, which flips the usual retirement math. Most workers defer income because they expect a lower bracket later. An athlete is nearly certain of it. Peak years at the top federal bracket are followed by years with a fraction of the income, which makes the deferral decision and the withdrawal decision two separate planning problems rather than one. Publication 590-A covers contributions to individual retirement arrangements and Publication 590-B covers distributions, including the rules on early withdrawal.

Team compensation arrives on a W-2, so the league plan handles part of it. Endorsement income, appearance fees, camp revenue, and licensing money usually arrive as self-employment income, and that opens a second door. Publication 560 sets out the rules for simplified employee pensions and qualified plans available to a self-employed athlete or the athlete’s business entity. A solo plan built on endorsement income can absorb a meaningful contribution in a top bracket year. Contribution room depends on net earnings from self employment after the deduction for one half of self employment tax, so the ceiling is rarely the headline number people expect. We calculate that ceiling, coordinate it against the league plan limits, and document the entity structure that supports it under the IRS business structures guidance.

The worked example is the retirement year itself. An athlete leaves the sport in March with 12,000 dollars of income for the whole calendar year and a traditional account holding 900,000 dollars. That year the athlete sits in the lowest brackets for the first time since college. Converting 100,000 dollars to a Roth costs roughly 15,000 to 18,000 dollars of federal tax at those low rates, against a cost near 37,000 dollars if the same conversion happened during a peak salary year. The conversion reports on Form 1099-R and flows onto Form 1040. Texas charges no state income tax on either version, so the entire decision is federal.

The common mistake is the early distribution. An athlete who taps a retirement account before age 59 and a half generally owes ordinary tax plus a 10 percent additional tax, and the athlete who does it in a peak earning year pays that at the top rate. We have watched a player pull money for a business idea in the same year the salary hit its high, turning a 100,000 dollar withdrawal into roughly 47,000 dollars of federal cost. A plan loan carries its own repayment rules and can become a deemed distribution if payments stop, which is why we price it against the alternatives first. The second common mistake is missing the low income window entirely, because the retirement year feels chaotic and nobody is running projections.

None of this touches what the money is invested in. That remains the job of the athlete’s own licensed adviser. Our part is the tax scoring of each option and the paperwork that follows, delivered through tax strategy consulting during the year and finished on the individual tax return afterward. The retirement year is the one window that does not reopen. Athletes who map the deferral years and the conversion years while still playing walk into retirement with a plan already written, and that is the entire point of doing the work early.

Contact Us